The Duffer Encyclopedia, 2nd Edition

Editing

Modification of a post in order to change some or all of its content, usually performed by its author though occasionally also by a mod (in this case the correct technical term is not 'editing' but rather 'tampering').

Motives for editing one's own post may include
[1] typos or grammatical errors
[2] correction of false data
[3] falsification of correct data
[4] pranks
[5] scavenger hunt-like dropping of clues which may result in finding a dufferish poem
[6] camouflaging an embarrassing moment resulting from the post
[7] inconspicuously spreading messages otherwise suppressed by the ruling class, i.e. the mods, e.g. 'D.I.A.D.'

Edith Freckles lists these additional motives:
[8] general dissatisfaction with the ways of the world, which has been channeled down to a single word
[9] a bear

Her definition,

[...] "editing" is another word for "modifying", which is, in this context, a less powerful variety of the "modifying" the moderators are capable of.

is however judged insufficient by this author as being both too fuzzy and dated (Ms. Freckles' bitter enmity to the moderators shines through everywhere, the writing dating to the 2nd Imperial Mod War, cf. Encyclopaedia entry of this name).

Today, law clearly states that each and every occurrence of editing must be identified by a disclaimer 'Last edited by [name]; [month/day/year] at [time] in order that one of the above motives may be inferred by any member reading the edited post and immediate action be taken, such as
[1] reporting the member to the Spelling Police or Grammar Squad for disciplinary measures
[2] heaving a relieved sigh and murmuring 'told him Napoleon was never banished to Hawaii'
[3] raising one or both eyebrows suspiciously
[4] blushing fiercely
[5] whispering, 'How did I not see this before?!?!?'
[6] laughing at the poster anyway
[7] murmuring, 'Wrong will be right, when Derny sees the light,
At the sight of her crown, Lieke drops her frown,
When she sits on her throne, we'll hail her alone,
And when she shakes her scepter, we'll bow low, even Specter.'

For non-mods, however, editing is limited to one's own post, as otherwise the forum would presumably go down in flames. It's difficult enough living with the knowledge that your brain is probably only reading off a teleprompter Lieke installed there.

- submitted by Miss Freckles
 
Last edited:
It was very tempting to edit that post, but I have successfully resisted. (Truth be known, having mod powers makes me worry more about getting banned than I used to. There's only so much trouble you can cause without them.)
 
Speaking of wikis...I had to explain to my mother the other day that "Wikipedia" has nothing to do with wickedness. I told her "wiki" came from Hawaiian, but she remains contentedly skeptical.

I suppose I could edit your post to say "Power corrupts, and nearly absolute power corrupts nearly absolutely," but I don't feel corrupted. Yet.

Getting modded is ontologically different than attempting to mod oneself.
 
It was very tempting to edit that post, but I have successfully resisted. (Truth be known, having mod powers makes me worry more about getting banned than I used to. There's only so much trouble you can cause without them.)

As the saying goes, with great power comes great opportunity, and opportunity breeds contempt...?!
 
Can we amend the DLF's entry to include the possibilty of it being GG messing with time travel? It is seeming more and more likely...

Also, we need to include the DLR.
 
You've eaten the universe and everything in it, including yourself. How could you not be involved?
 
Too late; I already passed it on to Sushi. He needed it. His latest opera hasn't been going well. The title is currently Death and the Banana, Which Caused the President to Crash into an Old Lady, Who Perished Miserably, Along with Her Dog, and Cat, Her Neighbor's Gerbil, and the Toast Beside the Fridge. He thinks it should be longer and more dramatic.
 
Sushi suggested essence of hemlock, but the Arts Council threw him out for "failure to display respect due to the public health" or something. He wrote a letter asking them about serving nightshade tea instead, and is still waiting for a reply.
 
I'm wondering, are the monographs and handbooks mentioned in the bibliography accessible to the wider public? I happen to possess the glorious "Marsh of the Moustache", Insane Asylum: A Sketch in Cheese Whiz, and Luminous Locks: Legends and Tales Around the Beard. I would be willing to donate them to the Duffer Library just as soon as somebody releases our valued librarian to us. I'm sure Olórin (the brain behind two of those titles) would be all in favor.
 
Correct grammar comes to you by thinking about it?? Whenever I do that, in the end every option sounds wrong. Like saying the same word over and over again. Bowl.









Bowl.










Bowl.













Bowl.
















Bowl.












Bowl.















Bowl.
 
Back
Top