Iamnotjustdreaming
New member
Which do ou guys think is thebest?
I havent seen the animated one yet but I just finished the BBC version. I dont understand how people can compare it to the new one. The new one beats it in nearly every aspact imaginable.
How about this. We will grade them both (BBC and new one)
<---BBC ||Aspect(Points out of)|| 2005 Version---->
9||Closeness to book(10)||7
CHARACTERS
9||Lucy(20)||17
13||peter||16
15||Edmund||19
16||Susan||16
10||Aslan||19
11||Beavers||18
5||Jadis||18
15||Tumnus||17
16||Professor||17
7||maugrim||18
MAJOR SCENES
12||Death||18
14||resurrection||15
3||Battle||19
Negatives
BBC-
Animations: - 50
Human animals: -25
Animatronic Aslan:-200000
Corniness: -100
Flying Aslan:-50
2005:
Gree Screen(obvious):-25
Sword Lifting Corniness:-30
Overall I just dont see how they compare at all. The only way BBC is better is when people are biased because they grew up with that version and are just lost in nostalgia. BBC version is just CORNY. Ther e is a reason they waited to make LotR until recently. It is because there wasnt the visual effects to use until recently. In the BBC version Jadis just tried to hard to be scary. In reality she was really freaky but not in a scary way she was freaky(weird). She raided her voice to try to seem evil. In the new one jadis was MUCH better. My sister said that she was much more scary than teBBC witch. She also made apoint where satan(or any demonic force for that matter) seems nice when they only plan evil and deception. The new WW playedthat part out much more than te overenthusiastic BBC witch. Not to mention the BBC death was just corny. Also I think that Aslan as an animatronic is just a disgrace. The new version gave him justice by making him seem REAL. Also the BBC roar was very weak. The new roar gave me chills. When the old Aslan talked it justmoved its mouth the new one actually looked like it was saying the words in sync. The peopel playing the animals was alsoVERY corny. I thought that the beavers looked like fat bowling pins with limbs, a tail , and a face (not to mentionyou could tell they had golves with clwas at the end on and you fould tell that they had a head piece and abody piece on.)
Worst of all was the animation inthe BBC version. Those are just the quintessence of corny. In the battle tehre werelike 50 TOTAL things involved. The new battle scene is AMAZING.
Just overall BBC is no comparison to the new version. If youlike it more then fine. I just think that honestly if you think BBC is better you need to look at what is actually better.
Music, some peoplesayBBC music score is better. Me and my sister agree that the new one's music is AMAZING
True to book, most people say they like it because it is more true to the book. These are MOVIES not books. They are supossed to be similar but it isnt word for word exactly the samethen it doesnt make it a horrible movie. If you ask which is the better adaptation of the book it is BBC but the new one is true to the book as well.
More magical, I dont see how it would be more magical. I dontsee how stuffed animal, animated creatures, steamy entrance in narnia and other things make for magical My sister and I agree that the new one is more magical in everything that happens.
In conclusion those are the main things i see when people say BBC is better. The only reasonable conclusion is that peopel just like BBC becase it came first. Nostalgia. I am sure that youg uys would like the new one better if it came first. The peple who love bBC are biased because after they fell in love with BBC they wouldnt like any other LWW no matter how good it would be
Thatis just my opinion on it. I dont mean to offend anyone by this. It just is it annoys me to see how people just are so biasedon loving BBC due to nostalgia. I actually saw BBC first(when i was really little.). Even though I dont remember it much. It may seem like i was biased but i was honest in my review.
I accidently posted this...Imeant to make it a poll.
(Note:Sorry for typos and spacing mistakes. Typing without a thumb throws off my rhythem in typing)
I havent seen the animated one yet but I just finished the BBC version. I dont understand how people can compare it to the new one. The new one beats it in nearly every aspact imaginable.
How about this. We will grade them both (BBC and new one)
<---BBC ||Aspect(Points out of)|| 2005 Version---->
9||Closeness to book(10)||7
CHARACTERS
9||Lucy(20)||17
13||peter||16
15||Edmund||19
16||Susan||16
10||Aslan||19
11||Beavers||18
5||Jadis||18
15||Tumnus||17
16||Professor||17
7||maugrim||18
MAJOR SCENES
12||Death||18
14||resurrection||15
3||Battle||19
Negatives
BBC-
Animations: - 50
Human animals: -25
Animatronic Aslan:-200000
Corniness: -100
Flying Aslan:-50
2005:
Gree Screen(obvious):-25
Sword Lifting Corniness:-30
Overall I just dont see how they compare at all. The only way BBC is better is when people are biased because they grew up with that version and are just lost in nostalgia. BBC version is just CORNY. Ther e is a reason they waited to make LotR until recently. It is because there wasnt the visual effects to use until recently. In the BBC version Jadis just tried to hard to be scary. In reality she was really freaky but not in a scary way she was freaky(weird). She raided her voice to try to seem evil. In the new one jadis was MUCH better. My sister said that she was much more scary than teBBC witch. She also made apoint where satan(or any demonic force for that matter) seems nice when they only plan evil and deception. The new WW playedthat part out much more than te overenthusiastic BBC witch. Not to mention the BBC death was just corny. Also I think that Aslan as an animatronic is just a disgrace. The new version gave him justice by making him seem REAL. Also the BBC roar was very weak. The new roar gave me chills. When the old Aslan talked it justmoved its mouth the new one actually looked like it was saying the words in sync. The peopel playing the animals was alsoVERY corny. I thought that the beavers looked like fat bowling pins with limbs, a tail , and a face (not to mentionyou could tell they had golves with clwas at the end on and you fould tell that they had a head piece and abody piece on.)
Worst of all was the animation inthe BBC version. Those are just the quintessence of corny. In the battle tehre werelike 50 TOTAL things involved. The new battle scene is AMAZING.
Just overall BBC is no comparison to the new version. If youlike it more then fine. I just think that honestly if you think BBC is better you need to look at what is actually better.
Music, some peoplesayBBC music score is better. Me and my sister agree that the new one's music is AMAZING
True to book, most people say they like it because it is more true to the book. These are MOVIES not books. They are supossed to be similar but it isnt word for word exactly the samethen it doesnt make it a horrible movie. If you ask which is the better adaptation of the book it is BBC but the new one is true to the book as well.
More magical, I dont see how it would be more magical. I dontsee how stuffed animal, animated creatures, steamy entrance in narnia and other things make for magical My sister and I agree that the new one is more magical in everything that happens.
In conclusion those are the main things i see when people say BBC is better. The only reasonable conclusion is that peopel just like BBC becase it came first. Nostalgia. I am sure that youg uys would like the new one better if it came first. The peple who love bBC are biased because after they fell in love with BBC they wouldnt like any other LWW no matter how good it would be
Thatis just my opinion on it. I dont mean to offend anyone by this. It just is it annoys me to see how people just are so biasedon loving BBC due to nostalgia. I actually saw BBC first(when i was really little.). Even though I dont remember it much. It may seem like i was biased but i was honest in my review.
I accidently posted this...Imeant to make it a poll.
(Note:Sorry for typos and spacing mistakes. Typing without a thumb throws off my rhythem in typing)
Last edited: