Goodness, I surely didn't mean to insult you! By 'Silly' I just meant it seemed a bit overdone. I don't disagree with you totally, but don't think Disney (the house that fears PC dogs) would have done it purposely. I think perhaps the Hollywood Ideal is out of habit, and possibly out of stupidity (audiences won't go to see a movie with out a white actor/-ess). I agree there seems to be a favoritism (as I stated with yellow-face). Perhaps, it is because American films, try to favor what an American Audience expects (or is thought to expect). It could also be that Hollywood is for anything that is 'safe'. Especially in today's Hollywood. That's why we have reboots,remakes,revivals,etc. When was the last time we had a movie that wasn't based on a previous successful property? When was the last time we saw a huge new star? Most big names have been in the business for at least 5+ years. I think maybe that's why 'Slum Dog' may have made as much as it was true to life opposed to the sugar-coated Hollywood image. Again, I'm terribly sorry to have upset you, it was not my intent. I don't defend it either, I just don't buy that Hollywood is pure evil, it's merely an over-bloated business. I didn't see 'The Last Airbender' due to yellow-face, which I disagree with. I won't buy 'The Jazz Singer' (1980) because the blackfacing was done WAY after it was considered no-longer socially acceptable. I certainly won't be happy if HHB doesn't cast a non-white. I also avoid any film that I find offensive for the same reason, I often time write to let them know such. I support what I approve and oppose what I don't. Perhaps prayer for a change would be best?