Which is more dangerous?

Which is more dangerous?

  • Total voters
    18
I think man, because they were the ones who ate the fruit way back when, and that was what made the animals officially "dangerous". And anyway, animals are easier to know what they're about to do if you know alot about that kind of animal, and people are WAY not predictable.
 
I think man because God made us with the ablity to think and plan where as nature is nature. Do you get what I'm trying ti say or is it come out weird??
 
I think man. Nature is nature and man is doing everything wrong even when they say they try to do it good. That is why we have the global warming at the moment. Thanks to the great plans of man.
 
i would say man. in the first place, it was man who caused creation to fall into the state it is in now (i realize that some of you will differ from this view). man is who has the ability (besides God) to change the way nature reacts by how we alter the biospears and environment. besides that, mankind has the ability to kill despite the fact that his very concience is screaming out against it. nature does not have a concience but is mearly working according to God's grand design. i would go more in depth, but this is after all, the land of duffers and not the thought provoking part of the forum.
 
Midnight Rider said:
I think man, because they were the ones who ate the fruit way back when, and that was what made the animals officially "dangerous". And anyway, animals are easier to know what they're about to do if you know alot about that kind of animal, and people are WAY not predictable.
Click to expand...


Yes, but I am not talking about animals in nature I'm talking about floods, hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquakes, I can go on an on with this list.... But you get my point. About the same amount of people are dying each day due to both man and nature.

*Earthquakes
*Massacres
*Hurricanes
*Gun fights
*Tsunamis
*Murders

I would continues with the list but I am not going to. Anyway..... It was a question that popped up on the news the other night and I though 'Thats a good question.' Nevertheless, think about how many people are killed by people each day and how many people are killed by nature each day before you answer....

WARNING! May cause your brain to hurt. DO NOT HURT YOURSELF TRYING TO THINK!!
 
Last edited:
Soccer_Angel_001 said:
Yes, but I am not talking about animals in nature I'm talking about floods, hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquakes, I can go on an on with this list.... But you get my point. About the same amount of people are dying each day due to both man and nature.

*Earthquakes
*Massacres
*Hurricanes
*Gun fights
*Tsunamis
*Murders

I would continues with the list but I am not going to. Anyway..... It was a question that popped up on the news the other night and I though 'Thats a good question.' Nevertheless, think about how many people are killed by people each day and how many people are killed by nature each day before you answer....

WARNING! May cause your brain to hurt. DO NOT HURT YOURSELF TRYING TO THINK!!
Click to expand...
then in that case, I guess a little of both.
Really? It is, is it? I've never heard anything about it.
Click to expand...
Look,. if you don't care, you don't have to post in the thread.
 
I actually think Nature is because, Man has not found a way to alter it (no matter how much we claim we have, I say proove it). The truth is that scientists neither understand Nature fully, nor do they care if they propagate heavily erroneous extrapolations.

If we could control nature, scientists would have found a way to stop Natural Disasters instead of just recreating them in Laboratories and computer models.

At any rate, even the atomic bomb, has little effect on people compared to Nature gone mad.
 
Back
Top