Does Lewis Imply that Eustace is Mormon?

Yeah, that Lewis. What a dinosaur. Who knows what he could have achieved if only he'd gotten with the times? He might have gotten the professorship at Oxford that they kept voting him down for, or maybe done something real memorable like go work for the U.N.
 
I always assumed it was some sort of special environmentally friendly underwear, mentioned as a humourous comment. I'm not sure if mormons would send their kid to the Experiment House (in modern America, at least, they're a more conservative religious group).
 
I'm with you, PotW, on slideyfoot's remarks. Funny thing, the "modern" thinking that Lewis slammed is being attacked by the very type of folks he would take issue with now--postmoderns.

Odd how "no corporal punishment" must be interpreted as meaning that Lewis preferred the idea of "beatings" for school children (check out Surprised by Joy to see what Lewis really thinks about this practice).

Similarly, Lewis' apparent dislike for mixed gender schools must be interpreted as him saying that children cannot learn anything in a mixed environment--again, odd, since his main characters are always paired one-to-one in terms of gender, and the lessons they are constantly learning from one another are central to his plot lines. Perhaps, just perhaps, Lewis has something else in mind by this comment? On a side note, it is an interesting "trend" in North American education that many schools (which are outlawed from "indoctrinating" anyone in those pernicious Christian texts slideyfoot mentions) are returning to gender "segregation" (oh, that evil word!). Funny, it seems that students learn better in an environment that doesn't force them into constant sexual competition, pageantry, and sniping at one another. It has everything to do with respecting the dignity of the sexes and nothing to do with degredation of one or the other, or both.

As for Christian texts and indoctrinating people with them, it seems I am at a total loss there. I'm not sure where that assumption vis-a-vis the Experiment House comes from--I'd love to see it in the text. Yet I suppose the assumption is justified (even though in Surprised by Joy Lewis expresses his sense of reverence and indebtedness to the atheist tutors of his youth). Lewis is a Christian; perhaps writing from that perspective isn't to be suffered from any writer (even a dead one) anymore? Perhaps the longitude and latitude of lofty position of objectivity from which slideyfoot writes should be shared with us all that we may visit it. Oh wait, "objectivity" is that chimera of modernism, isn't it? And I thought whimsical creatures like that only roamed in Lewis' imagination...

It is often clearer from the internal evidence (content of writing) than from the external (age of writer) what ideological epoch authors hail from.
 
Last edited:
I got the impression that his parents were "New-Age" like the start of the hippy trend

He calls his parents by their first name
He was raised a pacifist
He talked about vitamins (correct me if I'm wrong)
He attends a school that doesn't teach about The Bible

EDIT:
Read through the thread and see that others are thinking the same thing :D
 
I didn't even know there were any hippies any more.

Just wanted to say in response to PK's comments above (and PoTW's and Slideyfoot's earlier) that I am personally as beknighted as Lewis was cuz I think schools never should have gone co-ed. And I think kids should wear a uniform. I'm totally backward!
 
Ah, but Inkspot, you mean those sort of delightful, comfortable uniforms that both look and feel good, like royal garb in Narnia! I know you well, you mediaeval (man I love spelling it that way!) relic, you! And given that perspective, I fully agree that you should be knighted!
 
inkspot said:
I didn't even know there were any hippies any more.

Just wanted to say in response to PK's comments above (and PoTW's and Slideyfoot's earlier) that I am personally as beknighted as Lewis was cuz I think schools never should have gone co-ed. And I think kids should wear a uniform. I'm totally backward!
They still exist, just not as many. But then again we have a different breed of hippies, now a days, but I won't get into that ;)

btw, I agree with you about your views of how schools should be run.
 
Parthian King said:
What a bunch of archaic wackos! I'll bet you've heard of the Bible, or maybe even *gasp* read some of it! :eek:
Okay, I may have read a little, but only in the privacy of my own home, but I never indoctrinated anyone ...
 
mtdman said:
No, more like my own experiences with the Mormon faith. Which is why I say 'dunno', I may be biased. It's subtle yet it's there.
YOU'RE GOIN' TO HELL![no, I'm not swearing, if it's in the context I'm using] Um.. Exuse me.............people I was influenced by an exited preacher.
 
Of all the things you could conclude about Eustace's parents, why settle with "they're Mormon"? I think Orthodox Jews also wear special underwear. He could have been talking about thermal underwear. I had a professor one time who only wore 100% organic and unprocessed clothes, including underwear. Plus, Lewis also writes that Eustance's parents are vegetarians... but Mormons aren't even encouraged to be vegetarians. His parents seem odd, but not Mormon.

And if you're still not convinced:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=810
________
herb scales
The Mormon word of wisdom encourages vegetarianism.
 
No, more like my own experiences with the Mormon faith. Which is why I say 'dunno', I may be biased. It's subtle yet it's there.
I grew up Mormon and has studied religion for fun and this relates more to Mormonism than anything I’ve ever seen.
 
Back
Top