Give YOUR Movie review

Iron Man 3 (possible spoilers! Read at own risk)

Plot summary: Marvel's "Iron Man 3" pits brash-but-brilliant industrialist Tony Stark/Iron Man against an enemy whose reach knows no bounds. When Stark finds his personal world destroyed at his enemy's hands, he embarks on a harrowing quest to find those responsible. This journey, at every turn, will test his mettle. With his back against the wall, Stark is left to survive by his own devices, relying on his ingenuity and instincts to protect those closest to him. As he fights his way back, Stark discovers the answer to the question that has secretly haunted him: does the man make the suit or does the suit make the man? (IMDB.com)

My Rating: 3/5 stars

Review:

Where to begin? After the monetary and fan-based success of The Avengers last year, I think any superhero film has been hard pressed to live up to the expectations fans have. I think it's due to Avengers' success that this film has done so well in theaters, already exceeding Avengers' overseas haul, and breaking records set by Avengers' in such a short time. Even my expectations were high given how much I love/enjoy Avengers. Admittedly, I was not a big IM fan prior to this movie. I like the first Iron Man, but I found a lot of the content unnecessary and superfluous. I can't stand the 2nd film, so I was hoping that the 3rd movie would improve on the middle film. It did. PluggedIn berated this film for not having the emotional soul that the first film had, but I honestly beg to differ. Tony is shown as struggling with his status as a superhero, with not even his suits being able to save him from the nightmares and PTSD he struggles with as the result of what happened in New York. This film is an honest look at what celebrity status can do to people, and that being a hero isn't all it's cracked up to be. We see Tony's vulnerabilities, his weaknesses, his need to rely on others and his love for his friends (especially Pepper). I think we also see a new kind of Tony emerge at the end of this movie: a Tony that is no longer quite as concerned with himself as he is for those around him.

My biggest gripe with this film, however, is with the concept of The Mandarin. *sigh* This is where spoilers start, so stop reading now if you want to be surprised. The Mandarin is merely a front for the real villain. I feel purposely misled by the trailers and teasers because The Mandarin was being passed off as being this super evil, super nefarious villain...and all he is is a stage actor playing a part. It's because of this aspect I only give the film 3 out of 5 stars. Now, if we're talking about creepy villains, Killian Aldrich fits the bill. He is basically a scientist who has been messing with things he has no business fiddling with, and it literally backfires and blows up in his face. This film probably has THE scariest villains, as the bad guys in this film glow with fire, spew fire, and literally implode when their bodies decide to reject the drug(s) they're injected with. It's also because of this new level of scary/graphic that I have to put the film down at a 3 instead of 3.5 or 4.

Probably what was most surprising to me was the ending. Tony completely walked away from Iron Man. In doing so, he had the thing in his chest removed (don't laugh at me; I don't remember what he called it), and he destroyed all of his IM suits (presumably). It's this ending that has me wondering: will Tony return for Avengers 2, or is Robert Downey Jr. done for good with IM and the films? I certainly hope not, and I certainly hope we see IM return for both Avengers and subsequent IM films.
 
005AAH_Lila_Bata-Walsh_004.jpg


An American Haunting

Synopsis: She was an easy target. The Bell's histrionic teenage daughter named Betsy seemed to be repeatedly tormented by "demon forces".

Rating: 7/10

Review: Worth a rent.
 
I hardly every see a horror story, but thanks for the review. Weird photo.

Thanks for the IM3 review AK! I didn't read the spoilers bit because I may see IM3. I think your analysis is very good and helpful -- I am assuming whatever the problem with the villain is, that's what caused you to only give the film 3 stars ... so the villain is a big disappointment. I will go read the Plugged In review and see how it is for language and violence ...
 
I hardly every see a horror story, but thanks for the review. Weird photo.

Thanks for the IM3 review AK! I didn't read the spoilers bit because I may see IM3. I think your analysis is very good and helpful -- I am assuming whatever the problem with the villain is, that's what caused you to only give the film 3 stars ... so the villain is a big disappointment. I will go read the Plugged In review and see how it is for language and violence ...

Language wasn't that bad; there were some slang sexual references, but I only counted two of those.
 
babusya_3.jpg


Babusya

Plot: An old Russian grandmother, a product of "old" Russia who took part in the Battle of Stalingrad, sacrificed everything for her children and even sold her house to get money for her grandchildren, is shuttled among those very grandchildren--products of the "new" Russia--none of whom want her to stay with them since she's too much of a "burden" for them

Rating: 10/10

Review: A must see.
 
That is so sad! It can't have a happy ending. :(

I finally saw "The King's Speech" on an airplane over the weekend. It was really very touching and deserved the Best Picture Award that it got. Geoffrey Rush was wonderful as the diction coach, and HBC was lovely as Queen Elizabeth, and whoever played Bertie/King George was also very good.
 
Okay I am a bit late but here it is:
The Hobbit.

Plot: The Hobbit Bilbo Baggins is dragegd into an adventure by the wizard Gandalf (I always want to write Ganondorf thanks to Zelda :p )
Together with the dwarves Bilbo is on a mission to save the lost city and get rid off the dragon Smaug for once and for all. He meets Gollum and finds the one ring.

My rate: 9/10

What I liked: In general the story was very good. It was according to the books with some changes.
I loved Radagast the Brown (mainly because he was played by Sylvester McCoy who played the 7th incarnation of the Doctor) and the scenes were breathtaking.

What I didn't like: How Azog made it seems like Thorin Oakshield was very weak and not able to defend himself in the battle. They could have done a way better job with this. Some scenes were a bit rushed.

What I recommend: Hire or buy the DVD!!
 
I agree with your review. That was so true about Thorin's fight with the goblin; it did not go according to the book or the appendixes to LOTR at all, which was a shame. Thorin is a tough guy, and the movie didn't bring that out well enough. They wanted to give Bilbo some glory but shouldn't have done it at Thorin's expense ... Otherwise, totally agree with you. I loved it. I don't have the DVD yet, but I want to get it.
 
All right, you all are going to get two reviews for the price of one, because it is Senior Week, and I’ve been to the theater twice week, which is kind of pathetic, but there you go.

First up: Great Gatsby. I’d give it a four out of five. The plot was loyal to the book, which is always a plus in a movie based on a work of literature, especially one as definitive as Great Gatsby. The famous green light and eyes were used quite effectively. Leonardo’s performance as Gatsby was creditable but not spectacular. Costuming and scenery were designed well, capturing the flavor of the Twenties quite well. On that front, I can only criticize the use of modern music instead of jazz, since it felt seriously anachronistic. On a family friendly note, there’s some profanity, domestic violence, alcohol and drug use, as well as some gore, so I would say it is for teens and up. It’s a great choice for an English major anyone who wants to feel vaguely cultured.

Next at bat: Star Trek into the Darkness. My disclaimer here is that this is the first Star Trek movie have ever seen, so I won’t spot any continuity issues or things like that. I went to see the movie because my suitemate is a Trekkie, and I enjoyed Benny’s performance in Sherlock. Now that my disclaimer is out of the way, I’d give the movie four and a half stars out of five. The acting by everyone was really very solid in my opinion. There was a strong mix of action and emotion. Special effects seemed to be used fairly effectively, rather than just for the sake of it. Pacing was pretty well executed, except the beginning was a bit confusing and could probably have been shortened a little. On a family friendly note, there was a fair amount of gore and some cursing (calling people illegitimate if you get my drift) so, again, I would recommend it only for teens and up.
 
I agree with your review. That was so true about Thorin's fight with the goblin; it did not go according to the book or the appendixes to LOTR at all, which was a shame. Thorin is a tough guy, and the movie didn't bring that out well enough. They wanted to give Bilbo some glory but shouldn't have done it at Thorin's expense ... Otherwise, totally agree with you. I loved it. I don't have the DVD yet, but I want to get it.

What I didn't like: How Azog made it seems like Thorin Oakshield was very weak and not able to defend himself in the battle. They could have done a way better job with this. Some scenes were a bit rushed.

What I recommend: Hire or buy the DVD!!

I agree. I didn't mind Azog being in the movie (I had to look him up to see if he was even a real Tolkien creation), but I felt like the 'blood feud' between Azog and Thorin overshadowed the movie and they could have used Azog in a better way.
 
Thanks for the reviews, Sunshine Rose!

I have been wondering about Gatsby.
I can't believe the soundtrack isn't all jazz!!!

And I can't wait to see Star Trek Into Darkness.

They both sound good.

AK said:
I agree. I didn't mind Azog being in the movie (I had to look him up to see if he was even a real Tolkien creation), but I felt like the 'blood feud' between Azog and Thorin overshadowed the movie and they could have used Azog in a better way.
Yah. I agree with this too.
 
You're welcome, Inkspot. I figure that I should give reviews for some movies I enjoyed just so people don't think that my hatred of Prince Caspian translates into a hatred of all movies, lol.

Yeah, my friends and I couldn't believe the Gatsby soundtrack wasn't all jazz either. I guess the moviemakers were trying to make a link between our society and that of the twenties, but I think they could have drawn a bit more on the resources of the subtlety department. Still, Gatsby was enjoyable, at least for people who like classics.

I hope you enjoy Star Trek into the Darkness. As I said, I can't speak about it as a Star Trek fan, since this is the first movie I saw, but, as a novice, I did enjoy it.
 
protectedimage.php


Hukkle

Plot: Playing with very little dialogue, the film at first looks like a heartfelt look at a humble little village and its inhabitants.
Palfi repeatedly returns to a poor little old man who sits in front of his house and hiccups throughout the entire film

Rating: 10/10

Review: Must watch for those who likes comedy.
 
Man of Steel (2013)

Starring: Henry Cavill (Superman/Clark Kent/Kal-El), Amy Adams (Lois Lane), Russell Crowe (Jor-el), Diane Lane (Martha Kent) and Kevin Costner (Jonathan Kent)

[My] Summary: "Man of Steel" explores Superman's origins: what happened to Krypton, why he was sent to Earth, and how Superman/Clark Kent learns to use his powers for good and why he is so different from other humans. General Zod, a warrior from Krypton and banished to some abyss for several thousand years, has discovered Earth and knows Superman is there and wants him. The reason? Superman's DNA was encoded with the DNA sequencing of every type of Kryptonite individual: each person on Krypton is born artificially with their destiny planned out for them (some will be warriors, others politicians, others will be whatever else is programmed into their code). superman, however, is the only naturally born person to originate on Krypton. Zod wants Superman's DNA in order to 'rebuild' Krypton on another world: Earth. In order to make the atmosphere and environment hospitable to those from Krypton, all life on Earth has to be extinguished.

Review:
Being a 'Superman newbie', I had nothing but "Superman Returns" (2006) to compare this film to. I'm kind of glad...because this film was a much better attempt at Superman than its predecessor. Now, I haven't seen any of the other Superman films so I don't know how to judge this one in comparison to those. Henry Cavill was an infinitely better Superman than Brandon Routh, and I'm not just saying that because Cavill spent a good part of the film shirtless. :o (Ok yes, I would be lying if I didn't think that Cavill is H-O-T). I thought this film was pretty enjoyable, if not a little too long with a few too many battles. I mean, Smallville Kansas pretty much gets wiped out, then Superman and Zod get into a personal battle. Why didn't they just combine the two things into one instead of having a big battle and two smaller (interpersonal) battles after? Otherwise, I thought the film was a good origin story of Superman and answered some minor questions I had when watching "Superman Returns"

Rating: 3.5/5 because this stars Russell Crowe. And Diane Lane as Martha Kent. And because the pacing seemed slow to me.
 
Thanks for the review, it was helpful. Do you not like Russel Crowe? I was thinking of trying to get my husband to take me to Man of Steel this weekend, but he hates to go on opening weekend -- so maybe I can get him to take me to Star Trek again. I just watched Wrath of Kahn last night, and I would like to compare. What I would really like to do is watch Space Seed from ToA again because ** ST ID Spoilers** the new movie is like a combination of Space Seed and Wrath of Kahn -- kind of a reimagining of what if someone else had encountered the Botany Bay before Kirk did, so there's no personal Kirk vendetta. Anyway:

Star Trek: Wrath of Kahn, 1982 -- love it, 9/10 **Spoilers**

This film is the "sequel" to the ToS episode "Space Seed," which starred Ricardo Montalban as Kahn. He was a genetically engineered "Super Man" who led a rebellion on earth, trying to bring the entire planet under control of himself and his fellow genetically-engineered super people. They thought with their super-intelligence and strength they deserved to rule. (Their story is told in a series of ST books called "The Eugenics Wars." It's pretty good.)

They failed, and in an attempt to flee the angry earth, placed themselves on board a cargo ship, the Botany Bay, in cryogenic stasis and shot themselves into space. No one really knew what happened to them, until 300 years later, their ship is rescued by the Enterprise, and Kirk wakes them up. They try to take over his ship, and instead of taking them back to the Federation to go to prison for their war crimes, Kirk drops them off on a lovely planet where they can colonize and make a new life for themselves. That all happened in the ToS episode Space Seed.

In Wrath of Kahn, it is 15 years later, and ooops! The planet Kirk left them on has suffered the catastrophic explosion of its sun and become toxic and un-inhabitable. But Kirk made no public record of what he had done with Kahn & Co. and they have no way to communicate with the Federation, so a lot of them have died, and the survivors are darn angry. When they get the chance to leave their poisonous world, they seize a star ship and come gunning for Kirk!

It's a very exciting story, and it's very well done. Ricardo Montalban returns as the older, angrier Kahn, and does a marvelous job. This is the famous episode where Spock sacrifices himself to save the ship (and deposits his katra in McCoy's head, though no one knows that!) and it is a tear-jerker.

If you are a Trekkie you have already seen this. If you aren't, you might want to watch the Space Seed episode before you watch this one. It's fantastic.

I wanted to compare it to the new Star Trek, and I have to say, both are very well done. The new one works well with the new time line, but I still love Ricardo Montalban as Kahn. He's epic.
 
Thanks for the review, it was helpful. Do you not like Russel Crowe? I was thinking of trying to get my husband to take me to Man of Steel this weekend, but he hates to go on opening weekend.[\QUOTE]

I don't like Crowe for a variety of reasons; mainly because I think he is a terrible actor.
 
I should also say that there were some images of (artificially created) babies being extinguished; this bothered me because whether or not they were artificially created, they were still beings (not humans obviously). Here's what I mean: on Krypton, all infants are created in this water like environment. There are stalks and on these stalks are little balls which house the fetuses. During one of the battles near the end, this chamber is destroyed and all the life within it destroyed as well. I guess that in our day and age where life is valued so little before birth, this sequence bothered me a great deal since I'm so pro-life. But, if you can overlook that, the film is definitely worth watching again and again. I wouldn't mind seeing a sequel starring Henry Cavill.
 
Black Swan (2010)

Plot: A upcoming ballerina Nina drastically prepares herself for the duo role of the White and Black Swan in a new production of Tchaikovsky's "Swan Lake". Along the way she starts to have psychological problems and can't differ between reality and her own perception of it.

My rating: 10 out of 10.

My review: This movie was such an enjoyment for me to watch. I am very fond of the art of ballet and the music that goes along with. I also enjoyed how much it showed the struggle of the ballet and how competitive it is.

The whole cast was amazing and they got it down pat what the life of ballet and a ballerina is really like. Some of the images are grotesque, but they represent a haunting and true quality of the rigourous practices that ballerina's put their body through to attain perfection. The choreography was amazing and it was such a delight to see the stage performances, bits of New York, and actual bits of the Swan Lake production.

This movie is not for a younger audience as some of the scenes are mature in nature. The only downfall I found with it was that it could've been longer and the way certain things weren't explained, and if one didn't know what was going on they wouldn't be able to follow it.
 
Thanks for the review NB. I wondered about Black Swan when it was in cinema.

AK, I like Russel Crowe as an actor ... Oh well, there's no accounting for taste.

I didn't get to see Man of Steel -- my husband wouldn't go on opening weekend. And he didn't want to see Trek again! It is only showing twice a day now in one cinema near me, so I don't know if I will be able to see it a second time. :(
 
Back
Top