Harry Potter Book 7 *Contains Spoilers*

It is possible that Harry may weaken him and the others do it. I am not sure thats how it will work. That isn't too far fetched though. I do think though, that it won't be anywhere near what all of us expect. I just hope its not like a Starwars thing were they are at a volcano and somehow Harry does some jinx that flings Volde into the lava or osmething, lol.

tg
 
Harry Potter is the most famous person in the wizarding world. Having him die would make him even more famous. Having him live will have the same effect. Either way, no one will ever forget Harry Potter, the boy who lived.
 
Lucy_QueenofNarnia said:
but you are also forgetting about the next part of the prophecy: that Voldemort would mark 'him' as his equal--which he did, sealing the deal that it would be Harry, and not Neville. If Voldemort had not acted when he did, it could have been either of them. But since he went ahead and chose to attack (and failed) he just made the next part of the prophecy true and making it only possible for it to be Harry.
Click to expand...

Yes, but Voldemort has NEVER HEARD THE WHOLE PROPHECY!!!
He could definatly not know that only ONE boy would be a threat. He could find out that Neville could have just as well been in Harry's place!!!
 
I was just wondering, this thread is about Book 7 and says Spoilers. I wanna know who has spoilers on Book 7, come on fess up.....At least tell us the title.....LOL
 
echoscot said:
I was just wondering, this thread is about Book 7 and says Spoilers. I wanna know who has spoilers on Book 7, come on fess up.....At least tell us the title.....LOL
Click to expand...
No, by "Spoilers" it means it contains things about the other six books, such as Sirius and Dumbledore's deaths, the Horocruxes, etc.
Nothing about book 7 such as titles, but things in the other six that could effect book 7 or what we think is gonna happen in the seventh book.
 
QueenSusanofNarnia said:
Yes, but Voldemort has NEVER HEARD THE WHOLE PROPHECY!!!
He could definatly not know that only ONE boy would be a threat. He could find out that Neville could have just as well been in Harry's place!!!
Click to expand...

So Voldemort might kill him anyways, not knowing that Neville can't be the boy mentioned in the prophecy...gotcha.
 
yeah, that mite happen...but honestly, if any reason, i think it'll b because of the prophecy. u can gloat if i'm wrong (when the book comes out!)
ALSO!:

TRANSCRIPTS

I've got the transcripts from JKR's conversation on the british show, RichandJudy, where she talked about the seventh HP!
I'll post it in a sec!;
 
Richard (R): Now at some point over the last ten years or so, JK Rowling quietly became apparently richer than the Queen. So is the woman who created Harry Potter now in the position to say, "Off with his head"? And how has becoming one of the world’s wealthiest people affected somebody who barely a decade ago was a single mother struggling on £70 a week in benefits? Well, we’re going to find out now because JK Rowling, or Jo as she likes to be called, is giving us one of her incredibly rare interviews and it’s live. But first: the fruits of her extraordinary imagination.
[Clip from Goblet of Fire is played]
Richard: And Jo joins us now. I love that clip because it epitomizes for me what’s really good for me about the nature of your books. I mean we’ve [Richard & Judy] just left this, this valley of pain and distress which is bringing up adolescents...
JK Rowling (JK): [Laughs] Oh, good...
R: You're about to enter it, aren’t you?
JK: Yeah, something to look forward to then.
R: It’s just as bad as you think it’s going to be. Erm, but that’s what’s lovely about the sequence of books is that you see Harry turning into a grumpy adolescent and all the others around him going through these adolescent things. You’ve drawn up very accurately, and you don’t have adolescent kids yourself. I mean, is that just based on friends and conversations with friends who have got them?
JK: Well I taught teenagers for a while...
Richard: Of course, of course you did.
JK: They were my favourite age group to teach, in fact. So I think I drew on a bit of that, and I drew on memories of how grumpy we all were when we were teenagers. We weren’t...
Judy (J): Absolutely.
JK: My sister's here to watch this, and she was, she was very grumpy so I drew it on her.
J: Is she older than you or younger?
JK: No, she’s younger, two years younger than me, yeah.
J: Right. I mean, what I want to end - to happen at the end of the whole Harry Potter thing. I want Harry to marry Ginny, (Ginny Weasley) and I want Ron to marry Hermione. And all that and... no, I don’t. Yes, I do. I want Ron to marry Hermione, that’s fine. And I will be so upset if it doesn’t happen but of course the last one at the moment, is at the moment residing in your safe, yeah?
JK: The last, the final chapter is hidden away although it's now changed very slightly.
J: Is it?
JK: Yeah, one character got a reprieve.
R: Oh really?
JK: Yeah.
J: I mean you are, I just...
JK: But I have to say two die that I didn’t intend to die.
J: Oh no, two much loved ones?
JK: Well you know, a price has to be paid.
R: Significant?
JK: We are dealing with pure evil! So they don’t target the extras, do they? They go straight for the main characters... Or I do.
R: We don’t care about extras. You told your husband, obviously. You confided in him all things, and you told him.
JK: Well, not everything, that would be reckless.
R: Well, yes, let's be honest: that would be stupid. But you did tell him which ones were up for the chop. Apparently he shuddered and said, "Oh no, not that one."
JK: He did on one of them, yeah.
R: Listen, all the papers who have been promoting this interview today clearly want us to ask you, "Do you kill off Harry Potter?" It's a ridiculous question because are you likely to say yes or no? I mean, obviously not. You couldn’t possibly answer that but have you ever attempted to do him a little more harm than he’s suffered - I mean in the same way that...
JK: He’s already suffered enough, I mean what...
J: He’s already suffered, he’s been through the mill...
JK: How could I? Every year of his adolescence and childhood he’s saved the wizarding world. And no one believes him, and he...he spends his entire life saving the world, and then next term he’s just back at school being bullied. He's Harry Potter and he's just saved your entire school. And everyone thinks he' just a bit annoying.
R: You know how Doyle just got sick up there with Sherlock Holmes, so he pushed him off the cliff?
JK: Yeah.
R: I'm not asking if you've done that, obviously, but have you been tempted to bump him off because it's just huge...
JK: No, I've never been tempted to kill him off before the end of Book 7 because I've always planned seven books; that's where I want to - I want to finish on seven books.
J: Yeah.
JK: But I can completely understand the mentality of an author who thinks I'm going to kill him off because then there can be no non-author-written sequels, so they call it. So, it will end with me. And, after I'm dead and gone, they won't be able to bring back the character and write a load of...
R: That never struck me before...
JK: Well I mean, Agatha Christie did that with Poirot, didn't she? She wanted to finish him off herself.
J: So, you say you completely understand it, but you're not going to commit yourself?
JK: No, I'm not going to commit myself... I don't want the hate mail apart from anything else.
J: Absolutely. When you started off, when you first thought of the idea of Harry, what started off first? Was it the idea of the magic or the character or boarding school? When you were young, were you a big keen reader of boarding school stories?
JK: I read a few when I was younger...
J: Angela of Brazil?
JK: I never read Angela of Brazil. I read Mallory Towers and they really don't bear reading, do they?
J: No.
JK When I was six I really liked them. But, I think Harry and magic came together so the essential idea was a boy who was a wizard but didn't know - that was the original premise. So I worked back from there and that's where all the back story came from. And there's a LOT of back story. In fact now I'm in Book 7, I realise JUST how much back story there is because there's a lot to explain and a lot to find out.
R: But you must have had to invent the back story further down the line because you couldn't possibly have thought about this massive... in one go...
JK: Oh, no, you couldn't. I've got, I don't know how many characters I've got in play. Something ridiculous... around 200.
R: But did you ever think as you were writing the subsequent books "Oh why did I write that in Book 2? That's screwed me now. I can't write such and such now"?
JK: Yes. I don't think I've ever done that on a really major plot point. But, certainly, a couple of times I've hit a snag and thought, "Oh, I've boxed myself in. If only I'd left something open earlier and I would have been able to find an easier way to wriggle through that hole and I've always found a way... It is a complicated plot.
R: The last book's finished now; the last chapter, as you said, is in your safe?
JK: No the last book's not finished. But, I'm well into it now.
R: But you've written the finale already?
JK: I wrote the final chapter in something like 1990 - no, hang on... I wrote the final chapter in something like 1990.
J: Really? So you knew exactly how the series was going to end?
JK: Well, yeah. Pretty much.
J: Gosh!
JK: Yeah, I've been lambasted about that by a couple of people - I think they thought it was very arrogant of me to write the ending of my seven-book series when I didn't have a publisher and no one has ever heard of me. But I mean when you've got absolutely nothing and no one knows you, you can plan whatever you want... who cares?
J: Absolutely, and the other thing before we ask how you started writing was what struck us all, especially our son who is a mega Harry Potter fan, was when things started to get darker in the books. I think it started in the second one, with the Mudbloods... but it really got very dark in Book 3 with the Dementors and all the of that. Was that something you intended all along or did it just develop?
JK: It is something I intended because as Harry's growing up, these parallel l things are happening - he's getting older and older and more and more skilled as a wizard and simultaneously Voldemort's getting more and more powerful and he's returning to a physical form because, of course, in the first book he's not even a physical entity. But I've always said when people say that to me, and I agree that the books have gotten a lot darker, is that the imagery in the first book where Voldemort appears in the back of Quirrell's head, I still think is one of the creepiest things I've ever written. I really do. And also the image of the cloaked figure drinking the unicorn blood and slithering across the ground, which was done very well in the film - The Philosopher's Stone - I think those are very macabre images. So I don't think that you could say from the first book that I wasn't setting out my stall, really. I was saying that this is a world where some pretty nasty things can happen.
J: Yes. But what I'm saying is that I started to see some parallels from Book 2 between racism, apartheid and genocide and all that sort of stuff.
JK: Yes, of course, that was very conscious. Harry is entering this world, that a lot of us would fantasize would be wonderful - I've got a magic wand and everything will be fabulous. The point is that human nature is human nature, whatever special powers or tarnets you have, so you walk through - you could say through the looking glass. So he walks into this amazing world and it is amazing. But he immediately encounters all the problems he thinks he's left behind.
R: You can run but you can't hide.
JK: Yeah, yes.


(prt 2 in a sec!)
 
R: You talked about having a plan for seven books from the word "Go" before you even had a publisher. And you must've been doing backhand screams of delight when Philosopher's Stone got published. You know...
JK: Yes, unbelievable.
R: What pleasure and optimism.
JK: You can pretty much say nothing has come close actually. That's testament to the amount of euphoria that was.
R: Well when did the euphoria change from something...
JK: Sheer terror.
R: At what point in the books did you think, "Hold on, this isn't just a best-seller, this isn't just quite a nice series which I'm enjoying and the readers - this is unprecedented." It's been said that if you put all [printed Harry Potter] books in a big vault, they'd go around the world, around the equator, nearly one and a half times, and we ain't finished yet. When did you wake up and think, "This is historic"? 'Cause it's historic. I mean, you will go down in publishing history for the next few centuries.
JK: I honestly don't think of it in those terms. I'd say for the first three books I was in real denial. I really lived in denial...
J: About the fame?
JK: ...for a long time. Yeah, totally. And I think that's when my reputation for being somewhat..
R: Recluse.
JK: ...came from because I was like a rabbit caught in headlights. And the only way I could cope was "Ah it's not really that big a deal," but things keep on happening, they start door-stepping you, and you pick up a paper and there are casual references to Harry Potter. That's the freakiest thing is it permeates all the stores and it becomes - that's an indication to me how big it's become more than anything else. I remember there was a phase where I wouldn't buy the papers because it was becoming a bit strange to me. And normally I devour newspapers, and then it was Wimbeldon- just a few years back- and I thought, "It's safe to read Wimbeldon, stop being so, you know, get over yourself." So I picked up this paper and I turn to this account of this match with Venus Williams and they said, I just saw a picture of Harry Potter staring at me and they were talking about Bludgers, you know, the balls in Quidditch. They were saying her serve was so powerful it was being compared to a Bludger with not much explanation. But that was very cool - things like that are wonderful.
R: That's the fame thing, and that's entering the lexicon of sort of ordinary dialogue and stuff and what they call water-cooler conversations. And that's not just to deal with reading the latest book, it's a continuous thing with you now. What about the wealth? Now I don't want to be [inaudible] about that because it's just what it is. But you are unbelievably wealthy beyond the dreams of actors, really. How's that changed life for you?
JK: Hmm, well, it's great, frankly.
[R & JK laugh]
R: Thank you for saying that.
JK: I mean, not to crack out the violins or anything, but if you have been through a few years where things have been very tough, and they were very tough, and it's not so much romanticized, but it's dismissed in half a sentence: "Oh starting in a garret." And occasionally I thought, "Well, you try it, pal. You go there and you see. It wasn't a publicity stunt, it was my life." And at that time I didn't realize there was going to be this amazing resolution. I thought this would be life in twenty years.
R: But did you ever feel guilty about the amount of money you won because...
JK: I did! I absolutely did because it came to the point where - because initially people were reporting, and they still do frequently report much more than I got and I'm not pretending I'm hugely wealthy because I am. (group laughs) But sometimes they print figures that certainly my account wouldn't recognize. But, in the early days they were saying that I was a millionaire but I was nowhere near a millionaire. So that's weird and mind-boggling when you're used to counting every penny.
R: 70 pounds a week you were on.
JK: Yeah, yes, that's right.
J: So what was happening to you was that basically there were you just the same as you've ever been. Writing this book that you've been thinking about writing for ages. And suddenly it took off, just this one book. And suddenly the next book, and then you suddenly realized this person - you, actually - had taken on a life of her own, which wasn't new at all. And you were completely...
JK: I think that's completely accurate and I think that you sit there thinking, "But I'm still the same idiot I was yesterday, and suddenly people have an interest in what I've got to say." And my response to that is that I clammed up as well because I suddenly felt that this light had been shined on me underneath my stone, and it was a time of real turmoil when I first became subjected to that kind of scrutiny because I felt a loyalty to the person I've been yesterday. And I don't want to say, "Oh it was dreadful" because it really hadn't been dreadful. We've been doing okay and I'd been teaching and my daughter would still say, and said to me yesterday in fact, "You know, we're happy." So I didn't want to sit there and say, "Oh it's dreadful. Oh now it's fabulous darling, now we got a bit of money."
R: Yeah.
J: And is your daughter - you're two new ones are still too little - but Jessica who's been there with you right from the beginning, really. Has she adapted to it okay?
JKR: She's been phenomenal. And it hasn't always been easy for her because, well you can imagine, with your mother being JK Rowling. At one point I remember her being, metaphorically speaking, up against the school railings - [makes fist] "Tell us what the title of the next book is!"
R: Oh really?
JKR: Yeah. It's not terribly easy.
J: Up against the school railings?
JKR: By other children, you know, trying to get titles out of her. So she was amazing; she was very cool.

(prt 3 in a sec!)
 
(prt 3- and hopefully the last prt!)

R: But what about, it's not so much to do with the wealth. Well, it might have been actually, but certainly the fame thing. Before you met your lovely husband...
JKR: He is a lovely husband.
R: He's a reliable sort, and with sort of pop star/rock star looks [laughs].
[A picture is shown of Jo and her husband, Neil]
JKR: There he is!
R: Before that - the dating between the relationship which lead to your lovely daughter and him, there was this period where you found this immense wealth and success, and you said that dating was really tricky, really hard. Was that because you expected guys to be coming on to you because of who you were?
JKR: It wasn't so much that. To be perfectly honest with you, dating is just tricky if you're a single mother. That's it. And the other business was a vaguely complicating factor. But by the time you've got a babysitter it's just - it is the reality of life. I didn't have a nanny for quite a long time. I didn't have properly organised childcare because I think I was just, again, in denial about it when I needed it. And then there came a point when I clearly needed it - I couldn't cover all my professional obligations even though I was trying to keep them minimal.
R: You wanted to say, "I can cope, I can handle this".
JKR: Yeah I did, which is very much in my personality to pretend I can cope with things and not ask for help - until I've cracked up a bit.
J: So looking at where you are now, I mean personally as well as career-wise, professionally and all the rest of it, you're in a very good place, touch wood; if there is any wood round here to touch. Because you're very happy - you've got a lovely family.
JKR: I'm really lucky. And I think that every day, I swear. Every day I think how lucky I am.
R: Just looking at the constant theme - we're going to take a break in a couple of minutes, but then you're back and we've got some children who have questions - but, as you've said yourself, the theme of the books is death, isn't it?
JKR: Yes, largely.
R: Largely. It's a hugely powerful theme. And you were writing the first one when your mother died at 45, and you were very close to her. Had you envisaged that death would be such a powerful theme before her death or did it inform a sense of loss?
JK: Definitely informs it. Initially, in the first draft, I'd have been writing Harry for six months before she died. And, uhm, in the first draft I really finished off his parents in quite a flippant way. And then mum died. And I just couldn't, I couldn't finish off his parents in that flippant way - I couldn't. Not now knowing what it felt like to lose a parents.
J: So that's why Harry's parents maintain this presence...
JK: They do maintain a presence.
J: In the, in the, in the photographs.
R: And in the mirror, of course.
JK: And in the mirror...yeah
R: And when you wrote that, I wouldn't be surprised if you were to say that you have shed a few tears when you wrote those few sequences when Harry sits in the mirror lost in the reflection of his parents.
JK: That's my favorite chapter in the first book.
R: It's a lovely chapter. It's a lovely chapter.
JK: It's one of my favorite chapters in the series.
J: What's so reassuring about the books because they are, I mean you know, they do deal with straightforward evil and death. You always seem to leave a thread somewhere even though they're inside. I love all the headmasters, the past headmasters and teachers and they're little friends. I'm telling you, just to end this particular section but I always loved, what was his name? What was the one that was always putting his hair in curlers?
JK: Gilderoy?
R: That's right.
J: I love that, the idea of him in the evenings taking his curlers home and putting them in and everything. So there's a great deal of humor in the book as well. Presumably, that's just part of your character. I mean, that's what...
JK: Yeah, I think so, that you wouldn't always imagine it that way I'm describing it. But yes, I think so...
R: Yeah. Well, uhm, as you say, the last chapter is in the safe. You're tidying up the rest of the manuscript, but this is the last of the books...That's it? Seven books, that's all.
JK: Yes, well I've always said that I might do a kind of an encyclopedia of the world for charity.
R: OK, but that's not the same as the...
JK: NO, absolutely not. It's not the same as the story.
R: Can you live without Harry?
JK: Well, I'm gonna have to learn. It's going to be tough.
R: Why not extend it to 9 then? I mean, seriously, why stick to the seven? I mean, is it too much to ask from you?
JK: Because I think you've gotta go out when you've...
R: You've done it.
Jk: Yeah, you have. I admire the people who go out when people still want more. You know, and that's what I want to do.
R: I'm also told. Well, I actually read this on Tattler. Maybe it's an unguarded comment you made, but you've written, already completed another children's book, for younger children.
JK: Oh yeah. It's not completed, but it's pretty far on.
R: And how long has that been on you mind for?
JK: Not nearly as long as Harry, a few years.
R: And are you happy with it?
JK: Yeah, I really like it. It's for younger children, it's kind of a fairy tale - it's a much smaller book. so that's not - that would probably be a nice thing to go to after Harry, not another huge tome.
R: And is that in the future then? I mean, can you envision yourself picking up another huge idea like Harry Potter and running it over?
JK: Yeah if I liked the idea enough I definitely would, but I don’t think that I’m - I don’t think I’m ever going to have anything like Harry again. I think you just get one like Harry.
J: Well I think most people will be hoping that at some point in your life, that you will come back to him in some way, shape, or form...there will be something. ‘Cause you’ll have generations.
JK: Harry Potter’s midlife crisis.
J: Yeah.
R: Should he survive to see it.
JK: Right.
 
Thanks for the writeup on the interview. I watched it and missed things as it was long and I got bored, the interviewers were rather dull brits, lol.

tg
 
Back
Top