Midnight Rider
New member
Auctully, I haven't read HP, but I know what it's basicly about. I have read Narnia, and therefore I know what it's about. I have no idea what LOTR is about exept mabe somebody who has control of magical rings?
What do you mean, in HP the magic is bad and said to be OK? In HP, the magic is neutral or good, and some bad wizards use it for bad purposes. The same could be said for the magic in LOTR, used for good by Gandalf and bad by Saruman. Even in LWW, the magic is divided by Deep Magic and Deeper Magic, both are assumed to be good, one is assumed to be excellent or superior. I am not getting your point here ...tootsila said:Harry Potter is evil because the magic in it is bad and is said to be OK. Chronicles of Narnia, the books at least, are good because the GOOD magic is said to be GOOD, and the BAD magic is said to be BAD. I don't know about Lord of the Rings beacase I've never read it.
OK, OK, so I admit I might not know what I'm talking about... that's just what I heard.inkspot said:What do you mean, in HP the magic is bad and said to be OK? In HP, the magic is neutral or good, and some bad wizards use it for bad purposes. The same could be said for the magic in LOTR, used for good by Gandalf and bad by Saruman. Even in LWW, the magic is divided by Deep Magic and Deeper Magic, both are assumed to be good, one is assumed to be excellent or superior. I am not getting your point here ...
Chakal said:CASE TWO: There was a strange man in our neighborhood that every year would post a sign of a demon dressed in a red suit. "SATAN CLAUS!" it said. He was certain that believing in Jolly old Saint Nick was equivalent to taking Christ out of Christmas. Forget for the moment that Saint Nicholas was canonized by the Pope for his real life generosity, or that the Santa Claus we tell children about spends his whole life giving away things on the night of Christ's birth.
No I am sure you know what you are talking about, I am not sure I understand what you are talking about.tootsila said:OK, OK, so I admit I might not know what I'm talking about... that's just what I heard.
Im not being narrow minded,i can say what i want your probably saying im narrowminded b/c of what i said about HP right?I understand but honestly thats how i look at it, and maybe the Christain way i was raised doesnt allow witchcraft and the stuff that HP does.Lillee said:what a shame to be so narrow minded. oh well too each is own.
I agree Christians don't have to hate HP, but I am curious why you say HP is the farthest from Christian lliterature? There are many ways to see Christian symbols in HP. I listed a few somewhere ... but Danny listed a good one above: Dumbledore makes clear Harry is alive because his mother sacrificed herself for him, the strongest possible magic. Doesn't thi sound like Christ's "Greater love has no man than this, that he lay down his life for his friends?" Then there is the business of the patronus which protects Harry, in the shape of a stag. The stag is a symbol for Christ in ancient church history (St. Eustace converted when he saw the crucified Savior in the horns of a stag). Also, remember all the rejoicing of angels when Christ was born? Perhaps this compares with the rejoicing of wizards when baby Harry defeated Voldemort at the beginning of the series? Ordinary humans didn't understand the significance, but witches were hugging them on the street -- just as ordinary shepherds didn't understand the significance of Christ's birth, but angels sang to them anyway!Narnia Queen said:ok guys let me just point this out if somebody hasn't already Lord of the Rings is a Christianmovie and book depending on how you look at it same as Narnia after all Tolkien and Lewis were best friends but Harry Potter is the farthest but that doesn't mean that us Christians have to hate it
Get out! They had better start putting such warnings on Grims Fairy Tales, too.Chakal said:In Kansas now Harry Potter books are sold with a sticker inside the cover. "The Theory of Magical Powers is not scientific fact and readers are urged to carefully consider the evidence both for and against their existance."