Pardine
Active member
I don't think that's ruthless at all. Rowling's target audience were not adults, and as her books progress, the reading levels and themes get more and more adult, but they are all the way through directed at kids. I would say you CAN enjoy Harry Potter as an adult (I choose not to for my own reasons), but it wasn't designed that way.
Further, it seems like Tolkein is more a gardener and Rowling is more an architect. While there's no real wrong way to write stories, I get this feeling that Tolkein had so much about Middle Earth and its various ages written down that he simply plucked a story from its copious history and gussied it up for sale. He could have picked (and did, in various talks and letters and other writings) any number of such stories, each which would have coherent and cognizant continuity. His worlds seem vast and deep because that's how he wrote. JK Rowlings worlds seem weird and contradictory because the moment you get past the surface layer (which was never intended), you start to see the facades.
Further, it seems like Tolkein is more a gardener and Rowling is more an architect. While there's no real wrong way to write stories, I get this feeling that Tolkein had so much about Middle Earth and its various ages written down that he simply plucked a story from its copious history and gussied it up for sale. He could have picked (and did, in various talks and letters and other writings) any number of such stories, each which would have coherent and cognizant continuity. His worlds seem vast and deep because that's how he wrote. JK Rowlings worlds seem weird and contradictory because the moment you get past the surface layer (which was never intended), you start to see the facades.