Peepiceek
Well-known member
Well, then I think I broadly agree with youI agree with the first issue that the character of Peter was vastly different than in the book. My issue is what I am discussing, how the writers made Peter's character so different and whether their reasoning was valid and how much it opposed the book character.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5189/c51896754cb68cae40a1e4aa6cce06ce95147f43" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Peeps