are you with me "until the end" - ?
It's nice to like something so much that you start quoting from it as if it were Shakespeare.
HOWEVER, as Ross Perot once sharply remarked, "The Devil is in the details."
As I recall, Oreius's response to Peter's question, "Are you with me?" was "To the death!" not "Until the end."
Plus, I should know--I've already seen this so many times that I could quite literally act out any scene (not only every word of dialog, but every um and er). I haven't enjoyed something that much since Terminator 2 (admittedly a different genre, and fun for quite different reasons). I dragged my parents to it (their complaint that "It's a kids' movie" was clearly nullified by my observation that, about 80% of the time, there's not a kid in sight. (Plus, why should there be? They wouldn't know the story. Remember: it was written more than fifty years ago and is, therefore, quite dated.)
I'm surprised that the American audience didn't have more trouble with the over-the-top Britishisms ("Wake up, Dolly Daydream." "Didn't I tell you about the football field in the bathroom cupboard?" [= the rugby field in the medicine cabinet], "You cheeky little plyher" [wasn't honestly sure of the last word, but 'cheeky' means 'rude' or 'saucy', quite a perfect descriptor for Edmund--particularly after he makes his baby sister cry for no reason other than pure sadism]).
Narnia RULES! I just couldn't believe it. EXCELLENTLY done. I'm not sure why the fox took on such an expanded role. Plus--and I believe J. R. R. Tolkien complained to Lewis as well--the Father Christmas element was (a) unnecessary; (b) puerile; and (c) contradictory [since when does Father Christmas give his young followers swords, shields, bows and arrows, and daggers? Oh, well, at least the fireflower juice was a thoughtful, non-violent gift.
Speaking of violence, does anyone agree with me that Narnia went WAY over the top for an American "PG" rating. You obviously can't slap an "R" on a "family" film, but PG was weak and, frankly, PG-13 is weak. I would humbly borrow from the Swedish system and ascribe M-15 in lieu. (I suppose you need gratuitous sex to merit "R." I remember when--at twelve or so--I read "Jaws" [I had just seen the movie]. It was THEN that I learned what GRATUITOUS meant. Amid everyone fooling around with everyone else's spouse for 300+ pages, now and then we encountered a shark or the hunt for said shark. It was MOST disappointing.)
It's nice to like something so much that you start quoting from it as if it were Shakespeare.
HOWEVER, as Ross Perot once sharply remarked, "The Devil is in the details."
As I recall, Oreius's response to Peter's question, "Are you with me?" was "To the death!" not "Until the end."
Plus, I should know--I've already seen this so many times that I could quite literally act out any scene (not only every word of dialog, but every um and er). I haven't enjoyed something that much since Terminator 2 (admittedly a different genre, and fun for quite different reasons). I dragged my parents to it (their complaint that "It's a kids' movie" was clearly nullified by my observation that, about 80% of the time, there's not a kid in sight. (Plus, why should there be? They wouldn't know the story. Remember: it was written more than fifty years ago and is, therefore, quite dated.)
I'm surprised that the American audience didn't have more trouble with the over-the-top Britishisms ("Wake up, Dolly Daydream." "Didn't I tell you about the football field in the bathroom cupboard?" [= the rugby field in the medicine cabinet], "You cheeky little plyher" [wasn't honestly sure of the last word, but 'cheeky' means 'rude' or 'saucy', quite a perfect descriptor for Edmund--particularly after he makes his baby sister cry for no reason other than pure sadism]).
Narnia RULES! I just couldn't believe it. EXCELLENTLY done. I'm not sure why the fox took on such an expanded role. Plus--and I believe J. R. R. Tolkien complained to Lewis as well--the Father Christmas element was (a) unnecessary; (b) puerile; and (c) contradictory [since when does Father Christmas give his young followers swords, shields, bows and arrows, and daggers? Oh, well, at least the fireflower juice was a thoughtful, non-violent gift.
Speaking of violence, does anyone agree with me that Narnia went WAY over the top for an American "PG" rating. You obviously can't slap an "R" on a "family" film, but PG was weak and, frankly, PG-13 is weak. I would humbly borrow from the Swedish system and ascribe M-15 in lieu. (I suppose you need gratuitous sex to merit "R." I remember when--at twelve or so--I read "Jaws" [I had just seen the movie]. It was THEN that I learned what GRATUITOUS meant. Amid everyone fooling around with everyone else's spouse for 300+ pages, now and then we encountered a shark or the hunt for said shark. It was MOST disappointing.)