Portrayls of the dryads/naiads/nymphs in the three films thus far.

The blossom dryads were terrible. They came closest in PC to what I wanted when the tree died in the battle and a head showed in the leaves. Of course, the super roots was unrealistic, even in fantasy.

The LWW mermaids were better than the VotDT mermaids. I was fine with the LWW mermaids.

The river god was the best fit for the books in my opinion.

MrBob
 
The flower petals were kind of interesting, I thought. The mermaid in VDT was horrible. The trees in PC, not so good. Mermaids in LWW were fine. Some of the effects are good, some are terrible. Many of them just feel like an afterthought squeezed in. No mention of the big trees and river god till the very end of PC, and then they put on quite a show, don't they? Kind of weird. The setting and mood for the trees among Lucy when she sees Aslan for the first time was good, but the effects were awful. Wasn't that scene at night though in the book (not twilight). Night would have been better. Overall animals and creatures in this series are not taken seriously enough. I mean, Tumnus' ears, for instance. I thought they were going to fall off.
 
I looooove the scene with Lucy and the trees! It is one of my favorite scenes in the movie! (Which isn't saying much, I guess.... :rolleyes:) But really, the effects don't bother me at all! I think it was great!
 
I didn't really have a problem with any of them. Then again, I'm not that big of a critic. I LOVE the books, but I just enjoy the movie. I did like the mermaids in LWW better though than the ones in VDT... my mom couldn't even tell what the VDT ones were :rolleyes:
 
Aravis Kenobi. I am on your side on this matter. I was utterly disappointed with how the dryads and naiads were portrayed in the films so far. I did not like that the film dryads were; 1. Portrayed digitally. 2. Made out of bloody flower petals. 3. Not among the stone prisoners in the Jadis' courtyard like the book stated. 4. Not among the combatants of Aslan's Army against the Witch. As for the naiads I hated that they were: 1. Completely omitted from the first film. 2. Almost completely omitted the same way they were in the first film, with the except of the river god being portrayed(by the way, river gods are the same species as naiads, they are simply male versions. Lewis does mention male wood and river spirits along with female wood and water nymphs. Read MN, PC, and LB.), although I strongly feel that they made him far too huge, his head was stated to be larger than a man's but that doesn't mean that he's a liquid water giant! 3. Portrayed as replacements for the Sea People, and further more depict with bloody fishtails! Naiads ARE NOT mermaids!! The VDT film basically portrayed naiads as relatives of the merpeople only that they are made out of liquid! Plus traditionally naiads live in fresh water, not salt water! Nymphs of salt water are nereids or oceanids. This is going to be confusing for people who have seen the films but read the books later on. When they discover that the giant water man and the liquid mermaids are a river god nad naiads respectively, they're gonna get confused and say: "Ok, so the giant water giant is the father of those liquid mermaids that live out in Narnia's Sea?? HUH???"

If I had any say or hand in how the dryads and naiads were designed, I would have hade them for the most part be portrayed by real actors and actresses and only a minor but of CGI to make the naiads and river gods look like their skin and clothes give off a watery or bubbly feel. For how they looked, I would have the dryads were greek style gowns, tunics, and togas edged with leaves, paint their skin in shades of green or the color of bark, dye their hair or give them wigs with hair colored to make tree foliage with leaf headbands around the heads, and twigs and branches growing out of their hair. As for the naiads, same thing clothing wise, except have it in shades of blue and edged with foam and bubbles. Skin color would also be in shades of blue, green, and white. Hair would also come in these shades but with river plants growing and wreathing their heads. Also I would have their ears(both dryads and naiads) be slightly pointed so as to make them look less humans. Plus I would also have them be combatants in the battle against the witch with some of them using their abilities to tunr into trees and attack with their branches and roots(dryads) and manipulate water(naiads) while the others stick with traditional fighting weapons.
 
Jake, I think it would have been nice to make them like you described, except it was probably cheaper to just CGI whatever. That whatever is what they gave us in the film. Although I did like the dryads (petal's blowing around in the wind), I think something with real actors would have been better. The naiads on the other hand were terrible.
 
I looooove the scene with Lucy and the trees! It is one of my favorite scenes in the movie! (Which isn't saying much, I guess.... :rolleyes:) But really, the effects don't bother me at all! I think it was great!

Yea, I agree. I thought the dryads and nyads were really unique. I liked them better then the bbc version of them, which was just dressed up actors. I thought that was a tad cheesy. I think that they needed a way to make the dryads and nyads more treeish, and watery so I like the dryads and nyads in LWW, and PC. but that is just my opinion. :eek:
 
BarbarianKing, I totally agree with you. The naiads in VDT were pathetic. The only thing good about them is that they made them liquid as I anticipated. I remember reading the movie companion for LWW and it listed the units of Aslan's Army and Jadis' Army and it had a naiad with three kinds of dryads, two green ones and a cherry blossom one with one of the green ones wearing a helmet, and the naiad looked transparent, so I assumed that if they ever depict naiads in the films, they're gonna be like the dryads, except instead of having bodies made out of leaves and petals, they were gonna be liquid humanoids. What got on my nerves is that they were omitted from the first two films who's book versions clearly mention in appearing, and that they appear in the third film while VDT's book version makes NO mention of living in the seas of Narnia, and they were used as replacements for the Sea People, AND they were made like mermaids except being completely liquid instead of flesh and scale like the regular mermaids(which I liked because they blended the fish and human halves, and they actually had them appear in the film^_^). That doesn't make any bloody sense! If you read the books, it states that naiads live in the fresh waters of Narnia while the merpeople and sea people live in Narnia's Oceans. Also the books state that naiads and river gods are related and basically the same race. People who have watched the movies first and read the books later are gonna go: "Ok, so the big river giant guy is the father/male version of those liquid mermaids that live in narnia's oceans....?? HUH????O.0"

UNBE-FREAKIN-LIEVABLE.
 
Now you must remember that all these creatures are myths, not real, never before seen, so everyone is going to see them differently, you have your idea of what they might look like if they were real and Walden/Disney/any other company that helped have theirs.
In VODT I believe they were mermaids just Waldens (or whoever did them) idea of what mermaids look like, for all we know if mermaids were real they would just be shapes in the water! Just because the majority of people picture them as flesh and blood humans with tails doesn't mean thats exactly what they would be like! So with mythical creatures you can do them how ever you want.
 
When in doubt, look at the source material to determine what the mythical creatures should look like. This is one reason why the floral tree dryads fell flat for me.

I don't know if Lewis specifically described the mermaids/men in the series. He did describe well the sea people. Now of course, the number one issue they would have with these creatures is keeping them G rated. I have found the sea shell bras on mermaids to look ridiculous and to the credit of Walden, they have avoided this. In LWW, they just used blocking in the CG to avoid showing anything. In VotDT, they wanted to show a bit more, so they just opted to make them watery.

This would have been a big problem withthe sea people. They wore no clothes and that would have been a problem with the CG team.

MrBob
 
Back
Top