LWW, because the Pevensies went to Narnia not knowing what was expected of them and discovered a hidden strength. That sort of discovery comes once in a lifetime.
This is a tough one. I don't think I can decide until I've seen PC at least 3 or 4 more times, but I'm leaning toward LWW I think-not only because there were more changes to PC that I didn't like but also because of the sheer delight I took in seeing my favourite childhood books become a major movie was an incredible experience that's hard to top.
I agree with Tim and Hylian Princess on most counts. I think PC if a good movie ... but I much prefer LWW for staying more true to the book. Also, I was just overwhelmed to see the story come to life because it is my favorite of the CON and one of the very favorite books of my childhood and adulthood.How I feel exactly. It was so awesome to see a classic book come to life like that. I couldnt help smiling when she first saw the wardrobe, and then when Mr Tumnus came to the picture, and when they first met the Beavers. I didnt really feel like smiling alot in PC, except when they got back.
Welcome, Ithilin. I didn't see you post before.I'm not exactly sure which one I like better. Maybe LWW but only barely.
PC. I don't care that's it's nothing at all like the book. Caspian's so friggin' hot in the movie, and there's more action in the movie than in the book.
PC, though I think I'm in the minority here. I fell in love with the first movie before I really liked the books so it didn't matter to me as much that it didn't follow the book as it did to other people.
I like LWW better...they completely ruined Peter in PC and they kicked out and added so much stuff it wasn't REALLY Prince Caspian.
Walden Media's Non-Caspian movie should have been titled "Prince Harvey," with all other character and place names also changed. Then, taking it in isolation, it would have been a good movie. But since almost every character in it was seriously changed from what they were in the book, and almost every theme from the book discarded (the intentional degrading and ruining of Peter as a character fitting both of these), it was blatant false advertising for them to pretend that they were making a Narnian film. It was no more a Narnian film than "Shrek" was a Robin Hood film.