As I am reading through the thread I realize that being a fan of the books doesn't take away from anything if one is also a fan of the movies. Nor does it mean that one has to accept the religious ideals that the books talk about in order to appreciate these stories. I am one such individual who has long since dismissed the religious alligories, probably starting from my childhood.
For me, the Chronicles are stories and yes they teach us about the love that comes through unconditionally. They teach about moral standards, of that I can appreciate, but for me they are nothing more than well written children's stories, and that is how I specifically interpret them. I do understand the Christian allegory, however, but I don't read the stories for that, nor do I feel that one has to necessarily 'embrace' them in order to appreciate what Narnia has come to represent. To further my point, I do know of Agnostic individuals who have come to appreciate the moral ideals and values that are present in these stories.
As for the books being made into a movie, I think that I can appreciate the chronicles more through the movies because the visual images feed into my fantasy. Yes, I like the Harry Potter books and movies as well as liking Narnia, and can appreciate the books as well as the movies (although I did not like the Goblet of Fire). The point is, all fantasy books do have something that appeals to me on many levels.
As a writer myself, I can also understand the discouraged individuals who say 'it's not like the books' or 'it wasn't true to the books'. Yet, I also hear these same people who claim to be diehard Narnia fans saying that the BBC version of it stunk because of the effects (or lack thereof), but that version was truer to the books than the recent Disney/Walden film.
Moving on, just because something is put out by Disney doesn't automatically make it cheesy or stupid. Back in 1939 when 'Snow White' was released as a full-length feature film, it was massivly innovative. Disney, whether we like it or not, was one of the front running companies with special effects as well as CGI (working alongside Pixar). I happen to like some of the stuff Disney has put out, one of my favorites being the spirituality that seemed to postively emanate in 'Brother Bear'.
I know that sometimes Disney can go over the top with their sequels, but I also think that given their reputation with feature films (not just animation). I can honestly say that they have become of a mark of credibility, whether positively or negatively viewed. But, someone had to make the movie and Walden could not have done it alone. Disney did give the film some credibility, but as I was watching it in the cinema, I never once thought about it being a Disney movie, I saw it as being a very innovative film with a load of work put into it. I also found that a lot of the movie did not really scream Disney, but instead screamed about the handling of overall story, directing, costumes, etc. It was this handling that sold the film, not the companies that backed it.
Just my two cents worth.