One of the best means of presenting ideas can be science fiction (and fantasy). Both Lewis and Tolkien knew this. They actually agreed to write about space travel and time travel. Lewis produced the Space Trilogy and Tolkien never produced the time travel novel.
But Lewis' wonderful descriptions of the aliveness of "space" as it would be understood in a hierarchical and medieval view of the Universe is indeed mind-boggling. I thoroughly enjoy the description of Ransom's transport to Perelandra. And it stands in such wonderful contrast to the description of the journey to and from Malacandra! Rather a vivid mode of showing us the difference betweeen an iron-bound materialism life-view and a crystalline view open to the Light.
That Hideous Strength is the most challenging of the series because of the "bentness" of Thulcandra and the interference of the Enemy. It depicts the confusion that resulted from the choice of "knowledge of good and evil" as experential rather than potential only. Consequently, Lewis shows us the modern conundrum of piercing the veil set about us by sin. And the pictures are straight-forward. (In fact, I think I know someone who is Withers. But I may be being merely uncharitable. Still if you compare Withers mode of speech to this persons' the resemblance is eerily uncanny!)
But Lewis' wonderful descriptions of the aliveness of "space" as it would be understood in a hierarchical and medieval view of the Universe is indeed mind-boggling. I thoroughly enjoy the description of Ransom's transport to Perelandra. And it stands in such wonderful contrast to the description of the journey to and from Malacandra! Rather a vivid mode of showing us the difference betweeen an iron-bound materialism life-view and a crystalline view open to the Light.
That Hideous Strength is the most challenging of the series because of the "bentness" of Thulcandra and the interference of the Enemy. It depicts the confusion that resulted from the choice of "knowledge of good and evil" as experential rather than potential only. Consequently, Lewis shows us the modern conundrum of piercing the veil set about us by sin. And the pictures are straight-forward. (In fact, I think I know someone who is Withers. But I may be being merely uncharitable. Still if you compare Withers mode of speech to this persons' the resemblance is eerily uncanny!)