I saw this movie yesterday.
It was a very funny and interesting movie.
I like how they put a new interpretation on an old story.
About Rapunzel's age, well, I always figured she was a small girl physically.
If Mother Gothel is of normal height for a woman, you can see the difference (when standing near each other on the same level, well, they don't really make eye contact).
I do think Rapunzel looks better with the short brown hair.
It's a shame none of the dolls or toys have it.
And I did discover how she moved around with that much hair, somebody (usually Flynn) had to carry it and run beside her!
It was also interesting to see the "hair cheat" they did near the end of the movie to enable her to move around more normally.
Flynn sees a group of young girls braiding their hair, calls them over and there's a montage with them "styling" Rapunzel's hair in an intricate braid, which makes it much shorter (about ankle height).
And the look on those girls' faces was truly priceless, it was like he gave them the best toy in the world!
I was surprised to discover who was really the creative spirit driving this movie however.
It was Pixar.
The same thing happened with The Frog Princess last year, that was also a Pixar creation.
But oddly, you don't discover that until the very end of the credits, when both films mention "the Pixar braintrust".
I spot it pretty fast though, because I'm familiar with the names of the head staff from Pixar (for this movie, it was John Lassiter).
Is there some reason Disney is concealing who is actually creating these movies?
I suspect it may be related to the lawsuit Pixar and Disney had a while back (didn't really follow it, but it was about Disney trying to take over and being trounced by Pixar).
Also, I'm suspicious about the fact that their two biggest movies recently are from the same group of people.
Add in the directly created Pixar movies and it makes me wonder if Pixar is propping up Disney now.
Wow, I couldn't believe there were no spoiler tags on this forum.
I even spent 20 minutes searching for HTML codes to "mask" my spoilers, but the forums rejected all of them.
I did my best to mask the text that is spoilerific.
Read on at your own peril however, I can't guarantee it worked.
I was surprised by how Mother Gothel met her end.
In most Disney movies, there's some epic confrontation, battle for good against evil etc.
But all that happened was she fell out of a tower and turned to dust, because Pascal tripped her, she really shouldn't have kicked him, the little guy obviously had a grudge
I'm wondering if Rapunzel was ageless like Mother Gothel.
At one point in the film, she says that if Gothel lets her heal Flynn, they'll be together forever. Since her eternal youth is the result of being near the energy Rapunzel radiates by proxy, what effect would that have on someone who was the direct source of the energy. Was Rapunzel turning back time for herself as well as Mother Gothel?
That might be another explanation for her small stature, she was aging in years, but not physically, if every so often, she made herself a little younger.
The red herring they tossed in at the end was also interesting, where you think Flynn is dead, but a remnant of Rapunzel's power saves him.
Of course, now I'm wondering if the power was truly in her hair or in herself.
I'm thinking most of it was in her hair, but she was filled with it throughout her entire body, she just didn't know how to use it in any other way then through her hair.