So on narniaweb.com they're saying it's reached 357 million; that blows my head clean off! (hehe get it?)
No, but there are bits that several of us have greatly struggled with it. We wanted to see Prince Caspian stay with the spirit of the book and ALL characters. It didn't. Plain and simple. So we were disappointed and now wary of what is next to an extent. We don't all hate the film, several just struggle with it as a proper adaptation of the book...I use the word adaptation in a very loose manner.is it me or are all of the Mods on this NARNIA site Anit PC ?
OK, this might be a long post--I'm catching up!
First, in response to this incredibly piece of written brilliance:
YES! I'm with you 100%.
Now, on everything else...
I think if it had been closer to the book--but not 100%, I agree that with PC that wouldn't work--and barring stupidity from Disney "strategists", PC would have done better, not worse or the same. Lack of long-term advertising, the staggered openings, and not pleasing the fan base are the big three reasons for why it is viewed as not doing as well as it should have.
Regardless of name recognition, if fans like a movie they will come back again and again and pass the word (Pirates of the Caribbean comes to mind, for me. A friend went to see it on a whim, saw it in theaters multiple times, got all her friends hooked on it, bought it, and her friends went with her to see the two sequels the weekends they came out. Lord of the Rings was big because, though changes were made, they did not majorly offend the fan base and the base GREW with movie fans on top of book fans. New merchandise is still coming out and now 2 more movies are being made.
AND I must vehemently disagree with those who don't think the other books worth making into movies after Voyage. Perhaps you should go read the threads about the thoughts and hopes for these future movies and see how devoted book fans--and Narnia in general fans--are of ALL the books. ALL will make excellent movies IF DONE WELL and sufficiently connected via advertising to the Narnia name.
That's freaky. Someone is clinging to their childhood memories of Narnia and thinking, "A lot of small tots will be in the audience ..."Both times I've seen it, and different cinemas, they have shown a 5-10 minute trailer before for a TV channel called CBeebies which is a channel for kids between like 1 and 5!! Then to follow that with a film showing peoples' heads being cut off, deformed creatures such as hags and werewolves, and the general psychologically dark theme just seems preposterous!!!
I'd love to see 7 films for Narnia, but they need to be Narnia. Not bad adaptations that boarder on fanfiction set to film. I know the franchise could grow the way the others did...but I woudn't see it as a success if the films wavered too far from the books.
Here's the thing ... when PJ was filming LOTR, he wanted to make Arwen into a fighter, and fans found out and raised a huge ruckus ... and he backed down! Although there were substantial changes to LOTR, the basic themes of it were left intact (to my mind -- I know others disagree). But when it came to something drastic, the director listened to the fans. We didn't see that happen at all with PC.Elentari said:Lord of the Rings was big because, though changes were made, they did not majorly offend the fan base and the base GREW with movie fans on top of book fans. New merchandise is still coming out and now 2 more movies are being made.
ITW said:They need to do it right or not at all. The stories are film worthy, but now the question is if they can get the books made into scripts worthy of Jack's work.... Before adding extra, make sure you have every scene from each book. Don't cut out the good scenes and then add extra, that's just frustrating and annoying. (ie, adding the night raid and cutting out Aslan's restorative run through town) Stick to the books.
Yes, I remember that the very first TV trailer I ever saw for "Fellowship of the Ring" made it look as if the whole story were ABOUT Arwen as an Elvish Xena, and Frodo was only a minor supporting character!
I have to agree with Jules here -- if the series is threatened by PC's poor returns, then the producers should take notice that they will be lopping off a huge portion of the adult fan base if they continue to change the story lines willy-nilly.
I think that the books are worth making into films, but the kicker is that they need to be done right and done well. If they aren't I will oppose them. I'd love to see 7 films for Narnia, but they need to be Narnia. Not bad adaptations that boarder on fanfiction set to film. I know the franchise could grow the way the others did...but I woudn't see it as a success if the films wavered too far from the books. It would be a tragic event in that case. People would think that because they'd seen the films that the knew Narnia and they wouldn't. Not in the least....and that would be so sad to me. It would be horrid! I would LOVE to see these films succeed. I would. No doubt! But, I won't stand by and just support anything either. They need to do it right or not at all. The stories are film worthy, but now the question is if they can get the books made into scripts worthy of Jack's work. LWW was tolerable on that count. I'd have changed one or two things, but it was ok. Prince Caspian took too many extra liberties that did Jack's work no credit. PC was the hardest to adapt to film I think, but there are changes that did not need to be made and yet were made anyway.
Into the Wardrobe, some fans do not post because they want to spend their time well, and reading bashing to a fave movie is not nice.
Just to add another POV.
I think this Disney franchise will end either at Voyage or SC depending on the success of Voyage. It's pretty clear they're not gonna do the final three, much to my dissatisfaction, but if they're gonna ruin them I'd probably rather they weren't done (but I would love to see MN realised!!!).
Darth Sparhawk, I'm glad PC is a fave film of yours; I like it too. But remember that for some fans, it's downright upsetting to see integral parts of a book they cherish either scrapped or adulterated with little care shown. ITW and others don't mean their 'bashing' to be offensive to you personally. They too will be happy you enjoy it. I'm sorry if you took it to be so! A site like this with like minds is a good place to vent anger though!
Thanks Jax! The ID theft problem is taking a turn for the worse in a big way, but I'll survive.
You know, I don't know that there is a good way to gauge it. A lot of people have dropped off of posting on all the forums I think. People who were seen before aren't so much now, and many don't seem to want to put up a fight with the spoilers that come out. They may post once, but they're not going to go all out again. There's no point. If they're moving away from the forums, there's no telling how much or little of the Narnia stuff they're going to be buying. I don't think it will do as well as LWW did. Specter didn't think they'd come out with an extended edtition of PC, which may be a good thing if their deleted scenes are more Su/Caspian romance bits.
I think Disney and Walden want to strangle whoever leaked the early VDT script. It was one that had been tossed, but it did more damage to the trust fans had and they knew it. That leaked early script could have been made up of "the worst fears" thread I think...or something close to that. Horrific doesn't even begin to come close to accurate. Yes they've tossed that bad one and we don't know what is coming...but still it's not inspired a lot of faith and trust between the fans and filmmakers.
It's actually really ironic that this is the way things have turned out, because the BBC are renowned for the secularism and staunch opposition to supporting religion, particularly Christianity. So BBC news and documentaries always trash the Christian faith! It is remarkable then how faithful their adaptations were considering!