gogogoff
New member
Let's not discount domestic just yet. There's no way to tell how much legs this movie has for a long run.
slow and steady wins the race
Let's not discount domestic just yet. There's no way to tell how much legs this movie has for a long run.
I think it a bit simplistic to assign the blame to poor editing and an unappealing title character. I thought Ben Barnes was a good Caspian and played well the role he was assigned - it's just that the role he was assigned wasn't the role found in the classic book.
If Walden wants to continue making the books into movies, I hope they will catch on that their most dedicated base and biggest potential market is fans of Narnia, people who grew up on the books, who number in the millions. If they respect the stories (as Lion did), they can expect enthusiastic support. If they vary from the stories and think their screenwriters can do a better job than C.S. Lewis, then they can expect people to abandon them.
Take me, for example. I must've seen Lion five times in the theater, and bought the DVD the first weekend it was out. I've only seen Caspian twice, don't intend to see it again, and may purchase the DVD - though if I do, I'll probably wait for a used copy from Blockbuster. Multiply me by a few million people, and you explain the "meltdown".
Thanks, Lady of the Lion's Mane. It makes me feel better that you agree the movie was AWESOME.
This is suffering from inflated expectations due to LWW's immense popularity. LWW made 744 million dollars, number 26 on the all-time highest-grossing movie list. The filmmakers felt all they needed to do was to make this movie and viola, money in the bank. They were probably expecting it to pace or even outperform LWW. But is that even realistic?
There's a little bit of luck and forces working together for a movie to hit a perfect note with the audience. LWW had that magic while PC didn't. That magic is hard to come by. The real test will be VotDT. I would say that if it does worse than PC, the series is in trouble, but if it does better, the series will still have legs.
MrBob
Prince Caspian suffered a 60% fall off in its second week---despite a long memorial day weekend in the US. It is unlikely that it will now turn a profit given its 200 + million dollar budget. By contrast, The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe increased in popularity after its opening. Box office mojo writes:
" The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian melted an alarming 59 percent over the proper three-day weekend period, a steeper drop than The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe after a smaller start. The fantasy sequel grossed $29.8 million over the long weekend for $97.9 million in 11 days, while Lion had $117.8 million at the same point. " http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2499&p=.htm
I don't think its unreasonable to think that Disney pulls the plug on the franchise, especially if the third movie is not successful.
Prince Caspian suffers from poor editing and an uninspired and unappealing performance from the actor playing the title character.
They should have named the movie, 'King Edmund'. Maybe it would be doing better right now. I is jking...
You know what that is a good suggestion! I wouldn't be surprised if the movie would do better if they changed the title and took Ben Barnes out of it...haha.
Well...Edmund did do most of the heroic stuff in that movie. Kind of ironic, don't you think? Caspian merely stood around looking dumbfounded...or on the ground dare I say...looking dumbfounded.
And as far as Disney ruining movies? I disagree. As much as I love Warner Bros. they ripped the Harry Potter series to shreds, then tried to put all the pieces back together to try and make a movie.
At least Disney is doing the movies in the correct order!