I can't believe I dare to post in this thread, but I have to explain myself...
3) maybe y'all can try to see where the moviemakers did not mess up, such as the spiritual themes in VDT. At least you could try to look at the good stuff about the movie, and you can not deny that there was some good stuff in that movie.
I can't deny it at all, you're right. In fact I thought the entire film was good, up to the Lone Islands. Then everything came crashing down. Also, I thought the spiritual themes were really the worst part. The theme of temptation is not in the book at all, yet it's the main theme of VDT (we're blatantly told so by Coriakin). I wouldn't mind this, except I never really understood how this film explains fighting temptation.
We're told that we must "defeat the darkness inside ourself" to defeat the darkness out there. All that means is that we have to look to ourselves in order to defeat temptations (I thought that the characters should look to Aslan, not themselves. Yet they never do).
In the end, the film seemed to be about how the kids can take care of themselves. Lucy (not Aslan) stops Caspian and Edmund from killing each other. Lucy reads a magic spell, and nothing really happens. She dreams, and then Aslan tells her she's special, she should be proud of who she is, and not be like anybody else. Nice message, but different from the book - and I feel like I hear this in a lot of films. Eustace turns into a dragon, but oh! everything is okay. That just means he's extraordinary. Finally, in the end, the scary mist is destroyed, and Lucy says "
We did it. I knew we could" (emphasis added). Then Edmund says "I don't think it was just us." But is he talking about Aslan? No, he means
Eustace!
Please forgive the sarcasm in the last paragraph. It's a problem I have.
In the book, Aslan carries them through the story, saves the day for them. Yet in the film, even the long-awaited albatross did nothing but fly over them. I felt gypped! I don't really think the filmmakers purposely did all that. I just think that they don't understand the story very well.
4) be glad that it is not a junky pg13 rated movie. I had someone tell me that they thought the VDT was too childish. My response? It is supposed to be for kids. Yes, the last battle is a tad darker then the others, but they are all childrens books, and should be made into childrens movies, not junky movies with loads of worldly themes in it. It is supposed to be childish. It is supposed to be that kind of movie. If you think that it was to childish then you should stop watching junky, pg13 movies and watch a ton of kids movies or something, then tell me about it.
The rude way you talk about PG-13 films makes me think repeatedly of
The Lord of the Rings, which deserves none of this generic (though often true) criticism.
I'm homeschooled. The only R-rated film I've seen is
The Passion of the Chirst. All I watch these days are chick-flicks, because that's what Mom wants to watch. The action movies I get to enjoy are rated PG. So I think I basically fall under your "watch a ton of kids movies" category.
Here's what I thought: LWW was good because it appeals to children (the target audience of the books) and still has something for the adults, not to laugh at, but to actually enjoy. PC had less appeal to children and more to adults, but VDT? VDT was, for the most part, rather "childish". What I mean is that the film appeals to children, but much less to adults, because the story was less mature (I mean mature in a good way). We can't just say "it's a children's film" about Narnia, because that's not what the Chronicles really are. They were written for children, but adults still enjoy reading them. Tell me, do adults often read "The Boxcar Children" stories? No? That's because they're less mature material than the Chronicles of Narnia.
Now, let me say once more: I really don't hate VDT. I dislike a great deal of it, and I've explained why. If you disagree with my opinion, please feel free to explain, but if you want to attack something, attack my points, not me. That happens enough in the news article comments.
Please note, this is the first time in over a month that I've posted criticism in this forum. I'm not a Narnia-hater. I love the books (and the first two films) with all my heart.
Again, I really fear pushing submit...
please don't flame me.