There are lots of brain-dead movies, but one of the worst _Biblical_ movies ever made was "The Song of Ruth," about the Old Testament heroine by that name. The writer went out of his way to get everything all wrong.
One scene that should give the idea occurs after Naomi has returned to Israel accompanied by Ruth, and they take up residence in a hut. Local women get the idea from somewhere that Ruth has brought foreign idols with her, so several of them come to the hut demanding to be allowed to look for themselves. Ruth does NOT have any idols with her, having already become a believer in the true God by this time; therefore, all Naomi needs to do is say, "Sure, look for yourselves, we have nothing to hide." That would settle the matter. But instead, Naomi refuses to let them in, showing readiness to fight to the death first--which is the best way she could have hit upon TO APPEAR GUILTY.
Worse yet, however, they toss in a prophet who was not in the actual Scriptural account, just to make things "feel spiritual." The only spirituality the prophet offers, though, is relativism and subjectivism. The prophet says to Ruth, "You will have a descendant whom many will worship as the Messiah"--and Ruth is supposed to be happy about this way of predicting the birth of Jesus. But NO prophet of God would EVER EVER phrase the subject in this way. Either the predicted descendant will ACTUALLY BE the Messiah, or else Ruth is being given the BAD news that she will be the ancestor of a fraudulent fake. The script wording was trying to make everybody happy; but everybody would have been happy if the spoken prediction had been limited to the less-distant birth of King David. That much would have been perfectly true and agreed upon by all audience members. But instead, the writer devised a "compromise"--which, like other theological compromises, is no compromise at all, but rather an absolute rejection of the gospel, since Jesus has to be Lord in OBJECTIVE FACT or He isn't any kind of Lord.