I find it interesting that there is no mention of the Emerald Witch having a pallid white face. You think the children would notice that right off, wouldn't you?
I find it interesting that there is no mention of the Emerald Witch having a pallid white face. You think the children would notice that right off, wouldn't you?
She did? I'm not remembering her changing shapes ...But of course - she didn't necessarily have to take the same form as when she was the White Witch. We know Jadis had the power to change her shape.
I forgot about that. Yah, that seems a pretty different talent from, say, turning yourself into a huge hissing snake and fighting your attackers off.She didn't seem to have innate power to shape-shift, like the Emerald Witch did. What she was able to do was masquerade her appearance and that of others, using her wand. She did this to herself and her dwarf when Aslan's troops rescued Edmund. (in the book).
She did? I'm not remembering her changing shapes ...
But the idea that Lewis wanted us to realize they were the same person -- he could have at least made her snow white, so dummies like me would get it ...
I searched for connections after that, and the only one I found was that when Jill and Eustace and Rilian break through into Narnia it's winter, the same season the White Witch preferred. My theory on why winter was so essential to the White Witch is because the silver apple tree doesn't bear fruit in the winter, which fruit is "a horror to her." If this is the case with the Emerald Witch as well, then it is either because 1. she is the White Witch or 2. she also ate an apple from the garden.
Jadis can't change her shape at all (that we see)
CSL certainly did not seem to be trying to make it obvious that the two were the same.
Actually she can. Remember when she turned into a boulder, and made Gninnabrik look like a tree stump.
I am all for textual evidence, but let's be clear. LWW says:
That supports a lot of interpretations, but nowhere does it say Aslan ripped her throat out, or bit her head off, or anything else.
And to be a bit of canon stickler, all we know for sure is that Rilian tells us the story of the verse, which he says he learned from the Green Lady. We don't know that he's telling the truth; we don't know that she told all/any of what she knew; we don't know that what she told was right to begin with. (That is, he could be lying, she could be lying, or someone could be mistaken.)
Wait, what? Sorry, I'm just really confused by this statement. Are you saying there weren't humans in Narnia? Or that hags are human? Or...what, exactly?
I wonder if the new Silver Chair film (if it gets made) will adress this. What if the director decides to interpret that they are the same?
I'll throw my popcorn at the screen if they cast Tilda and she plays LGK anything like she played Jadis. Even if one chooses to assume they have the same body, their personality is still vastly different.