Comparing the Narnia Trailers

This post is partially about satiating a geeky desire and partially about looking at what went right and wrong in the two Narnia movies (specifically the marketing aspect). This will not be in-depth, just to warn you.

First, let’s take a look at the “teaser” trailer (it’s a long teaser at around two and a half minutes) for The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and see what stands out.

LWW teaser trailer

The words that appear on screen are

IN THIS HOUSE
THERE ARE MANY ROOMS

THERE ARE MANY DOORS

BUT ONLY ONE

LEADS TO ANOTHER WORLD

WALT DISNEY PICTURE
&
WALDEN MEDIA
PRESENT

BASED ON
THE BELOVED MASTERPIECE
BY C.S. LEWIS

THIS CHRISTMAS

A DESTINY
WILL BE FULFILLED

AND THE CHRONICLES
WILL BEGIN

Everything about this trailer exudes charm and newness. The colors are bright. There is heavy focus on unique and iconic imagery (like the lamppost in the snowy wood). Some of these images are used to evoke thematic motifs, like that of discovery (with Lucy pulling the sheet off of the wardrobe). Essentially, what we are promised with this trailer is an exciting fairy tale with strange, mythical creatures (like the centaurs, griffins, the briefly seen mermaids, and other creatures never before put to screen with adequate computer effects) and a moral to boot. Again, there is heavy emphasis placed upon uniqueness.

The teaser trailer for Prince Caspian is also a bit long for a teaser.

PC teaser trailer

The words that appear on screen are

THIS SUMMER

THE TIME HAS COME

TO JOURNEY BACK…

TO NARNIA

WALT DISNEY PICTURES
&
WALDEN MEDIA
PRESENT

ONE YEAR LATER
FOR THEM

1300 YEARS FOR
NARNIA

A NEW AGE HAS BEGUN

FROM C.S. LEWIS’
EPIC MASTERPIECE

THIS MAY

THE FATE OF ALL

LIES WITH THE DESTINY
OF ONE

Immediately, we are reminded of the previous film, which is definitely a good idea since the first film was both well received critically and a massive box office success. This is followed by a somewhat violent transition into Narnia, which, juxtaposed against the peaceful and friendly wardrobe of the previous entry, already makes the film seem like a Summer action film rather than a charming family film. Prior to the entry into Narnia, there is no dialogue at all, which suggests that this story spends less time on earth which further suggests that it is not the moral tale that the prior film was, but, rather, a wholeheartedly fantastical film. The scene cuts are abrupt, suggesting a fast moving and, perhaps even, violent film. Notable is the fact that, while the first film called the source novel a “Beloved Masterpiece,” Prince Caspian claims to be based on an “Epic Masterpiece.” The following images indicate preparation for war, which further indicates violence, something notably minimal in the prior installment. While these images pass on-screen, Trumpkin says “You may find Narnia a more savage place than you remember.” Also notable is the reduction in never-before-seen creatures (you get the anthropomorphized trees and the river god). Further emphasized is war violence, which makes it seem potentially exciting but, again, also makes it seem inappropriate for children.

Next, let’s look at the theatrical trailer for LWW.

LWW theatrical trailer

The words that appear on the screen are

WALT DISNEY PICTURES
&
WALDEN MEDIA
PRESENT

BASED ON
THE BELOVED MASTERPIECE
BY C.S. LEWIS

THIS CHRISTMAS

SOME JOURNEYS

TAKE US FAR
FROM HOME

SOME ADVENTURES

LEAD US
TO OUR DESTINY

The most notable addition is that we see animals talk. At the time that this trailer was released, that had never been done successfully (and certainly not seriously) in live-action before. This immediately makes the film seem like a classic Disney film (and, therefore, a most likely quality family film). This film looks to be going where Disney should be going. Also of interest is that a brief speech by the symbol of goodness in the film (the talking lion Aslan) is immediately followed in the trailer by a brief speech by the symbol of evil in the film (the White Witch Jadis). This strongly alludes to the themes of good versus evil in the film.

Finally, let’s look at the PC theatrical trailer.

PC theatrical trailer

The words that appear on screen are

ONE YEAR LATER
FOR THEM

1300 YEARS LATER
FOR NARNIA

WALT DISNEY PICTURES
AND
WALDEN MEDIA PRESENT

Note the even heavier emphasis placed upon violence and fighting. Note that, although you do see Aslan and hear Liam Neeson, the two are never synced so as to show the talking of Aslan. No animals are shown talking. Note quotes like “You were right to fear me,” “Narnia is about to be annihilated,” and the returning quote “You may find Narnia a more savage place than you remember.” Note that one of the quick, creature shots is of the werewolf, which is actually kind of scary-looking. Note, also, the subdued colors. All of this suggests a film far less family-friendly than its predecessor.

My conclusion (that I had already reached before today, I admit) is that, while strong competition (like Iron Man, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, and, yes, even Sex and the City) did play a big part in Prince Caspian’s lackluster box office, the second Narnia film probably could have better held its own against such competition if it had been (and been marketed as) a family film. At the time of its release, there were not many quality family films out. So, for The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, Disney and Walden need to return to the charm and newness that helped the first film succeed. In the third book, there are new creatures (Ramandu, the Dufflepuds, etcetera) and strange visuals (the dark isle and the lily-covered ocean come immediately to mind) that need to be shown predominantly in the trailers. A good trailer for VDT will start out with around a minute set in our world (used to establish the two returning lead characters and the new leading character as well), will give strong hints at the transition into Narnia (the painting), will follow this with a brief description of why King Caspian is out there in the Dawn Treader as a voice over while images of the earlier islands are shown, and will end showing some of the stranger and more exciting images from the story (again, like the Dufflepuds, Ramandu, the dark idle, the end of the world, Eustace turning into a dragon, Coriakin’s house, and the attack of the sea serpent).

6 Comments

  1. I Totally agree. If Disney had marketed Prince Caspian more as a family film it would have done much better. Family films are their strength and that is what they should stick with. I just hope they learn from their mistakes with Prince Caspian and aim The Dawn Treader more at families.

  2. I agree, but I also think that because Disney changed so much of the story, like the castle raid and the exclution of when Aslan goes through the town at the end, also did not help Prince Caspian do well. Disney should try to stay true to Dawn Treader and actually make it a family film so the trailers will show it is one. That way, Disney doesn’t have to lie about the movie in the trailes.

    • There is one thing I’d like to comment on, for this statement: Aslan going through town.

      That sequence alone, due to the effects it would have taken, on top of telling the story, hiring the actors, extras, designers and crew, building the sets, and rendering the CG would end up with a price tag of around $50 million. This is just an estimate, and I’m probably estimating a bit on the low side.

      That’s one scene that, while memorable in the book, it is definitely something to skip to save some money, or a lot of money.

  3. I think the summer release made them feel like they needed to be an action spectacular to compete with Iron Man blowing up a tank, which is not Narnia’s strong point. Besides all of the metaphor and richness of the world, there is a sweetness to Narnia that is missing in the ads.

  4. the one major problem with PC is their casting of prince caspian not to trump their poor advertisement but to add to it, in the books caspian was around 12 or 13 and they cast a 24 year old to play his part. if they really wanted to maintain the innocence and newness of the movie they should have taken the characters age into account I mean really it would seem much more family friendly if once again a child was suddenly placed into kingship. Also the romance that they twisted in the movie between caspian and susan showed up nowhere in the books. Most certainly PC was much more adult than LWW and therefore a box office flop where it could have been a box office success.

  5. I agree in part, because I felt the marketing came off as an undisguised attempt to bring out a lot of older fantasy fans, which is never the best idea for advertising for a film that is directed towards families. But I think that this was a darker and more violent film than the first Narnia and perhaps most other Disney films, so to market it as if it were the same as other Disney movies would be somewhat dishonest.

Comments are closed.