Thanks, Sunrise yah, I was talking about the BOOK
Ella Enchanted. The movie was, as you say, an abomination. Here is another case in point where the director, writers, someone decided to update the book and make it relevant to today's teenagers or pre-teens ... and it was
horrible! I could only watch about the first 10 minutes. Then I gave up.
Truman, you say thank goodness PJ didn't take our view of LOTR, but in fact, he did very much stick with the LOTR story, just compressing the timeline a bit and adding an expanded role for Arwen which did no damage to the story.
What was added to PC, in my opinion, did damage the story, as Sunrise has said.
LWW was more like the book, I agree, Powl, than PC was. And I do not take the opinions of people who bother to post their negative reviews on IMDB as proof that in sticking to the book LWW was "bad." Clearly LWW way out-performed PC at the box office internationally, and this, to me, is evidence that straying from the book damaged the future of the film. LWW was a modest success in international box office, and there was no talk of ending the series with it. Only after the tepid response to PC was there talk of not making the rest.
As much as I enjoyed PC (and I did), if the movies are going to continue to devolve away from the storyline of the books, I say they
should quit making them. I am sure Gail Carson Levine wishes the movie of
Ella Enchanted had never been made! I think we can probably surmise what CSL would think of a Peter the Magnificent who behaved like a spoiled Harry Potter ...